| Re: [NEWS] Why is Shatner Not in Star Trek? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.startrek · Group Profile
Author: Robo-manRobo-man Date: Sep 11, 2008 18:56
"JKconey" aol.com> wrote in message
news:48c86ade$0$29512$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>
> "Robo-man" cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7WBxk.12$lr4.5@newsfe01.iad...
>>
>> "Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
>> news:090920081842196798%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
>>>
>>> From ComingSoon.net ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is William Shatner Not in Star Trek?
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> .....Well, his character died on
>>> screen. Maybe a smarter group of filmmakers
>>> could have figured out how to resolve that.
>>>
>>> Paramount Pictures will release Star Trek on May 8, 2009.
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess that simply proves that Abrams is not a smart filmmaker. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> It's a shame that they don't have *Time Travel* in the Trek universe. LOL
>>
>
>
> Isn't the real issue a way to make him look about 10-15 years younger
> and trimmer. I love the guy, but it would be a real stretch for him to
> play himself at a younger age.
Heck no.
With 'Sci-Fi' you can do anything. Especially with the 'Q' running around
the universe. After all they did a pretty good job at trying to explain the
Klingon 'change of appearance' by being genetically engineered.
|