Re: [NEWS] Shatner responds to Abrams
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.startrek only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: [NEWS] Shatner responds to Abrams         

Group: alt.startrek · Group Profile
Author: heremon
Date: Sep 19, 2008 12:59

Shatner is a tricky situation. As a director, his next step up is to
producer. But as we all know, the franchise itself has been too
tightly reined-in for such a maverick production to occur.
Conceivably, a return to the TOS-timeline might at this point occur as
an independent production entirely under the control of the original
cast, with Shatner hiring a big name science fiction writer to
"rescue" Kirk.

Such a classic scenario could then be adapted for the screen by one of
today's top screenwriters, and maybe even directed by Leonard Nimoy
himself. I don't really see what prevents this from happening, except
maybe a lack of desire on their part.

ToolPackinMama wrote:
> Anybody wrote:
>> From ComingSoon.net ...
>>
>> Shatner Responds to Abrams' Star Trek Comments
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> In what all is starting to sound like miscommunication,
>> William Shatner has responded to Star Trek director
>> J.J. Abrams' comments from last week about why the
>> actor is not reprising the role of Captain James T.
>> Kirk in the May 8, 2009 release.
>>
>> It seems to us that someone in the film's production
>> told Abrams that Shatner didn't want to do a cameo and
>> wanted the movie to focus on him. As you can see from
>> the video below, Shatner says he was never contacted
>> by someone about taking part in the movie, but agrees
>> that he wouldn't be up for just a cameo and suggests
>> they resurrect him in the follow-up.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/v/CzOs4WEutQ8&hl=en&fs=1
>>
>>
>> "Miscommunication"?!? I guess that's the politically correct way of
>> phrasing "battle of over-bloated egos". ;-)
>
> "Hey Bill, if they ask you to do another Trek movie, ask for the moon.
> If you don't get the moon, that means you didn't have to be in another
> crappy Trek movie. If you get the moon, then you get the moon. There
> is no downside to this."
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!