"Led4Aces"
SLWatson <
"Kweeg" <
>>>>>>>>> But how is re-imaging TOS going to hurt you? You can still
>>>>>>>>> watch
>>>>>>>>> TOS
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> TV,
>>>>>>>>> and in DVD form, you can still buy books, games, poster's, and
>>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>>> else. Choose not to watch the new movie if you are so against
>>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> others give it a chance.
>>
>>>>>>>> No.
>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, the movie is already being made...
>>
>>>>>> So what? Doesn't mean the smart people need to give it a chance.
>>
>>>>> LMFAO! The "smart people" that have based their opinions on
>>>>> speculation
>>>>> and
>>>>> hearsay. Burn the witch!
>>
>>>> And everyone else has blindly chirped like baby birds for whatever
>>>> the
>>>> studio hands them. "Please, suh, can I have some more?"
>>
>>> ahh no.
>>> See that's the point, the movie is not even out yet, and I for one will
>>> wait
>>> to from an opinion of the movie AFTER we've SEEN it. You obviously
>>> don't get
>>> that, as you already formed your opinion based solely on speculation
>>> and
>>> hearsay, and people that do that seldom do. Hey Ravine how about that
>>> sequel....
>>
>>> --
*snip*
>>
>> From
Creation.com:
>>
>> Filmmaker J.J. Abrams has made it clear he's boldly going where no
>> "Star Trek" has gone before with his upcoming big-screen saga of
>> Captain Kirk and the Enterprise crew's early days, while reportedly
>> promising, "We're serving the people who are completely enamored with
>> Star Trek."
>>
>> Be that as it may, Clifton Collins warns die-hard fans of the original
>> series that this ain't your grandmama's "Star Trek" for sure.
>>
>> "He's totally reinvented the whole thing and taken the cheese out of
>> it," says Collins, who co-stars in the film with Chris Pine, Eric
>> Bana, Winona Ryder, Zoe Saldana and Zachary Quinto. "I tried to watch
>> some of the old 'Star Treks,' and with all due respect, they were
>> probably cool at the time, but I couldn't watch them."
>>
>> He says of the new "Star Trek," "This is the real deal. It's just got
>> a lot of reality. It's not corny at all."
>>
>> --
>>
>> How much of it's hearsay when the people who are in the film, and the
>> director of the film, are saying things that totally make my heart
>> sink? No, really. I would like to know that. How exactly is that
>> heresay?
>
> Yeah they are saying things that might be easy to take out of
> context... if one is inclined to do so. The comment about taking the
> "cheese" out of Star Trek is fine with me if they are referring to
> 3rd season cheese. We just don't know EXACTLY what 'cheese' they are
> referring to... so it's easy to get the mind working in a negative
> direction. Plus the whole idea of the word "reboot" is likely to get
> any fanboy's panties in a bind. They like TOS with the characters they
> know and the actors that made the roles famous. Well that's over,
> done, finito. Time to move on. The new movie will be different and
> probably will violate canon, but if they capture the essence of what
> made TOS great, if they nail the character interactions and the
> camaraderie and combine it with a good sci-fi story, it could work and
> be good. Why not be hopeful instead of piling on a film that no one
> has seen. It won't be the original....but it's not supposed to be.
> Some people in these parts need to accept that.
Well put, but I doubt you'll persuade the die-hard canon/original
cast-loving people. If the movie is actually good by its own merit, they'll
only be cheating themselves.
Natalie