|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: MI5-VictimMI5-Victim Date: Nov 29, 2006 22:28
Eye Say, and Lord Gnome Answers
My interactions with Private Eye started in May 1995, shortly after I'd started bleating on usenet. I tried to get the Eye
interested in my case, as I thought they more than anyone have their finger on the pulse, and would surely already know
something about my case. In my first email to them, entitled "pas de bouteille?" (wot no bottle?), I asked if they had the
nerve to publish what was known to many thousands of people. Their email flunky answered;
Date: Thu, 11 May 95 13:40 BST-1
From: strobes@ cix.compulink.co.uk (Private Eye)
Subject: Re: pas de bouteille?
In-Reply-To: <199505102232.SAA19988@freenet.carleton.ca>
Bottle? Dunno really - but I've passed your mail on to the Ed for his
consideration.
Steve Mann
(strobes)
==========================================================
Date: Mon, 15 May 95 12:51 BST-1
From: strobes@ cix.compulink.co.uk (Private Eye)
Subject: Re: hello again
In-Reply-To: <199505122236.SAA02574@freenet.carleton.ca>
Hello yourself...
|
| Show full article (3.68Kb) |
|
| | 403 Comments |
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Nov 30, 2006 00:21
AND if GOD wanted gay penguins to hold hands HE would have given them
FINGERS.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Elvis GumpElvis Gump Date: Nov 30, 2006 02:10
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> Toxteth O'Grady wrote:
>
>> It's quite possible to be anti-terrorist AND anti-Bush. I do it every
>> day.
>>
>
> So do I. In fact, I believe only anti-Bush people are ~seriously~
> anti-terrorist.
Funny since America has pretty much terrorized the rest of the world for
years installing our puppet dictators everywhere and then acting
surprised that this never works or lasts long.
> BTW I "support our troops" MORE THAN YOU DO! :)
Fuck soldiers.
They knew they were signing up to kill other people and now they are
upset that they are being sent to the slaughter on an indefinite amount
of tours of duty so the commander-in-thief and his cronies get richer?
Or that the people they were sent to kill shoot back? Gee, I'm sorry
they are depressed by my personal lack of support.
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FozziFozzi Date: Oct 5, 2006 19:55
>
> Fozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> You do realise that QED correctly refers to a mathematical proof, not a
>> logical one dont you?
>
> You do realise that a logical proof is, by definition, functionally
> equivalent to a mathematical one.
>
Only if it contains a mathematical function somewhere, anywhere, within it.
cheers
fozzi
PS, Castelvi and Harper pay attention, this is an example of how to
criticise properly, sam made his point and left it at that, ie no slap given
means no slap back
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: sam_garretsam_garret Date: Oct 5, 2006 20:27
Fozzi wrote:
>>
>> Fozzi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You do realise that QED correctly refers to a mathematical proof, not a
>>> logical one dont you?
>>
>> You do realise that a logical proof is, by definition, functionally
>> equivalent to a mathematical one.
>>
> Only if it contains a mathematical function somewhere, anywhere, within it.
>
> cheers
> fozzi
>
> PS, Castelvi and Harper pay attention, this is an example of how to
> criticise properly, sam made his point and left it at that, ie no slap given ...
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FozziFozzi Date: Oct 5, 2006 21:00
>
> Fozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> then frankly you need to get the fuck over yourself, if the english
>> language
>> was a woman it would be a two bit whore, its hard to find another
>> language
>> anywhere in the world that hasnt inserted part of itself into the english
>> language, what you are in love with is dictionary english not english
>> itself, which didnt even have formal spelling until 180 years ago,
>> besides
>> it is only a dialect of german anyway.
>
> Translation for our American readers:
>
> Yo mommatongue is such a skanky ho, aint nobody what aint stuck a bit
> of them in her and lost it, dictionaryfucker! We's kicking it new ...
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Oct 30, 2006 16:24
Everybody: please remember that no matter how Kirk looks to us from our
vantage point, that he was respected by the people of his (fictional)
day as a role model, and his Starfleet superiors regarded him to be an
exemplary officer - and furthermore, virtually everyone in Kirk's
universe liked him as a person.
There is ample evidence to support that assertion in the original show
and TOS crew movies. Furthermore, in DS9 (Trials and Tribblations) that
point was only emphasized, when Captain Sisko was shown to be a
worshipful fan of the historic Captain Kirk.
|
| |
| 23 Comments |
|
|
Author: Elvis GumpElvis Gump Date: Oct 30, 2006 17:48
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> Everybody: please remember that no matter how Kirk looks to us from our
> vantage point, that he was respected by the people of his (fictional)
> day as a role model, and his Starfleet superiors regarded him to be an
> exemplary officer - and furthermore, virtually everyone in Kirk's
> universe liked him as a person.
And in you're micro-universe he and Spock also bugger each other.
Tell me, what color is Vulcan spunk?
> There is ample evidence to support that assertion in the original show
> and TOS crew movies. Furthermore, in DS9 (Trials and Tribblations) that
> point was only emphasized, when Captain Sisko was shown to be a
> worshipful fan of the historic Captain Kirk.
Considering how much I loathe DS9 this is poor salesmanship.
--
A hypothetical paradox:
What would happen in a battle between an Enterprise security
team, who always get killed soon after appearing, and a squad of
Imperial Stormtroopers, who can't hit the broad side of a planet?
-- Tom Galloway
|
| |
| 19 Comments |
|
|
Date: Oct 30, 2006 19:00
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> Everybody: please remember that no matter how Kirk looks to us from our
>> vantage point, that he was respected by the people of his (fictional) day
>> as a role model, and his Starfleet superiors regarded him to be an
>> exemplary officer - and furthermore, virtually everyone in Kirk's
>> universe liked him as a person.
>
> And in you're micro-universe he and Spock also bugger each other.
>
> Tell me, what color is Vulcan spunk?
Blue, of course. What other color would it be???
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: GeneKGeneK Date: Oct 30, 2006 19:23
"ToolPackinMama" lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:D8OdnQX96YQ4CtvYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com...> Everybody: please remember that no matter how Kirk looks to us from
> our vantage point, that he was respected by the people of his
> (fictional) day as a role model
Not only in the fictional Trek universe, but also in the equally
fictional universe that was network television in the mid-1960's.
GeneK
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
