> Elvis Gump wrote:

>> George Peatty wrote:

>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:53:05 +0100, "Jaxtraw"
>>> knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> I'm sorry, but she really wasn't much to look at truth be told, and
>>>> that hairdo was an Iraq-level disaster.
>>>> http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/jwallace.htm

>>> There's a scene of her in Deadly Years in the corridor talking to the
>>> elderly Kirk, and her face is lit by a key light. In that instant,
>>> she looked positively beatific. I do agree that the picture you
>>> link to really doesn't flatter her

>> A photographer can and often does flatter women with lighting, filters
>> and angles that hide a multitude of shortcomings. As do trowels of
>> makeup and lots of lifts, tucks, suctions, implants and injections.
>>
>> What is 'beautiful' will be different to most people and the more
>> slender actresses of that era who were probably considered scrawny at
>> that time translate to being closer to today's 'norm'. ...