Wickeddoll® wrote:
> "Anim8rFSK" ...
>> Michael Bowker wrote:
>>
>>> Wickeddoll® wrote:
>>>>>>> Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Giovanni Wassen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what anyone thinks. You will never convince
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the *average* straight man wouldn't be horrified
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> furious at being labeled gay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it depends on the situation and the people doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. I get labeled gay all the time. I'm single and an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in showbiz. I'm so not gay that I don't care. Nobody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knows me at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinks it; it just seemed to be an automatic judgement based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the above. It's like they said I had an eye in the back of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head or something; it's so not remotely possible it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bother me. Usually I find out when someone (more often than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a woman)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will remark after knowing me awhile "wow, I thought you were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gay, but you really aren't, are you?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Star Trek 09:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No Shat, No Show.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, I would never suspect someone is gay based on their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occupation, but alas, many do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Natalie
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There must be some occupation it would be a safe assumption
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like a male fluffer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Star Trek 09:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No Shat, No Show.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I even wanna know what that is?
>>>>>>>>>>> As I understand the term, a fluffer is the person who's job it
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> to keep male porno actors erect.
>>>>>>>>>> Talk about hard work.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Natalie
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is a show called "Dirty Jobs", I suspect this qualifies.
>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt they would show that there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh I agree. But I would think it qualifies.
>>>>>> Depends on your point of view.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Natalie
>>>>> Well as a recreational activity, we are glad gals are on the spectrum
>>>>> of
>>>>> willing to eager to do it. But as a job I wold think it sucks either
>>>>> way.
>>>> :-P
>>>>
>>>> Natalie
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sank you I'll be hear all ze Veek.
>> Be zure to try ze veal!
>>
>> --
>> Star Trek 09:
>>
>> No Shat, No Show.
>
> I'm thinking like Anim!
>
> hep me hep me hep me!
>
> Natalie
>
>
...and there it is.
:)