Re: "about as interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" sequel"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.startrek only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: "about as interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" sequel"         

Group: alt.startrek · Group Profile
Author: Fozzi
Date: Aug 23, 2008 06:31

aol.com> wrote in message
news:842d031e-54dc-46f9-9968-a53974ddda93@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>
>> It's sad, but let's just say it: This time out, the kids are about as
>> interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" sequel. Susan (Anna Popplewell)
>
> That critic obviously forgot about the "nuclear wessels" thing, and
> Chekov discovering Khan and getting the worm in his ear. I would call
> those incidents "interesting."
>

the critic also clearly never read the book (not that im suggesting the
writer of the second movie did either), Susan is *supposed* to be sullen and
unpleasent in this story it sets up for the last movie where susan becomes
far more interested in life in our world refering to Narnia as "that silly
little game we used to play as children". one always has to laugh at the
competence of a critic who criticising an actor for giving the performance
that is actually required of them. I must admit im surprised that the second
of the chronicles movies was 'Prince Caspian', I realise that was the order
that they were written but in in-story chronological terms it is actually
the fourth story. (the correct chronological sequence within the story is
The Magicians Nephew; The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe; The Horse and
his boy (the events of which take place between the battle for Cair Paravel
and the children returning to our world during TLTWATW), Prince Caspian, The
Voyage of the Dawn Treader, The Silver Chair and lastly The Last Battle.

Cheers
Fozzi
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!