> The rule of thumb says when you have something that works don't mess with
> it. Or in otherwords "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." TNG and DS9
> worked. Voyager was simply filler to completethe trilogy. Enterprise was
> completely extranious and were better off without it. Why not continue
> Exploration using Jake Sisco and Nog and maybe worke Wesley in or then
> again maybe not. Anyway my point is why try to go in a totally different
> direction when the direction we were going was correct. After all the Trek
> continues.
> "Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
> news:200820060913449248%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com... ...

> anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
> news:200820060913449248%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...

>>
>> AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!! NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!!
>> Why do the morons in Hollyweird have to try and "reboot"
>> everything?!? This is going to be one stupid, ill-fitting movie that
>> will finally kill off Star Trek. X-(
>>
>>
>> Any chance of William Shatner making an appearance in Star
>> Trek XI ?
>>
>> "Absolutely not," an unnamed studio source told the site,
>> "This is not just another Trek movie but instead a total
>> reboot, we will see things that are similar to what is
>> known in the Trek Universe but we will not be held to
>> every aspect of the last 40 years. We are going to
>> introduce Star Trek to a whole new generation and many
>> more generations to come. ...

>
> AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!! NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!!
> Why do the morons in Hollyweird have to try and "reboot" everything?!?
> This is going to be one stupid, ill-fitting movie that will finally
> kill off Star Trek. X-(
>
>
> Any chance of William Shatner making an appearance in Star
> Trek XI ?
>
> "Absolutely not," an unnamed studio source told the site, ...