> On 14 Jun, 12:36, oldwifetale yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Jun 14, 9:17 am, "skepti...@aol.com" aol.com> wrote:

>

>>> On 14 Jun, 07:12, oldwifetale yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>> On Jun 14, 6:51�am, oldwifetale yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>>> On Jun 13, 11:10�pm, skepticl1 aol.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>> On 10 Jun, 19:02, oldwifetale yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>>>>>> No, it's *not* censored except in the msm. I hate to tell you this,
>>>>>>> but censorship in the msm has been going on for decades. The
>>>>>>> censorship is nothing new, it's just a little more blatant and 'in
>>>>>>> your face' than it used to be.

>

>>>>>>> I saw the information about Kucinich earlier today on several
>>>>>>> alternative news sites which are - (yes, believe it or not) - totally
>>>>>>> available to the general public or anyone who's willing to 'keep up'
>>>>>>> on who is doing *what* in politics.

>

>>>>>>> It was also on C-Span.

>

>>>>>> There has been inattention from most mainstream media on
>>>>>> Representative Kunicich's attempts at impeachment President Bush.

>

>>>>> What else is new?

>

>>>>>> There has been disparagement from pseudo progressive websites such as
>>>>>> 'Slate' and a complete absence of the Impeachment report from the
>>>>>> Democrat Party's liberal mascot 'MoveOn.org'. On line coverage was
>>>>>> advanced instead from such liberal sites as 'Rawstory' and 'After
>>>>>> Downing Street'. As of 5:00 PM today the articles had yet to been
>>>>>> published on Kucinich's official House website or on CSPAN, which
>>>>>> aired the presentation live but has thus far failed to provide an on
>>>>>> line archive of the historic moment. More over Kucinich's campaign
>>>>>> website, 'Kucinich.US' was disabled without correction by its provider
>>>>>> which claimed that it was currently unable to handle the requests due
>>>>>> to a temporary overload.

>

>>>>> Don't be so dependent on msm.

>

>>>>> It was passed to judiciary which basically makes the whole thing
>>>>> basically 'null and void' because by the time it would get to the
>>>>> point of being considered, Bush's term will have ended. So an
>>>>> impeachment process is too little, too late. At this point, it should
>>>>> be criminal charges which are never too late.- Hide quoted text -

>

>>>>> - Show quoted text -

>

>>>>http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/alerts/362

>

>>>> "...However, Kucinich said that the effort is not only about
>>>> Constitutional law and his personal feelings. He wants to demonstrate
>>>> to future U.S. presidents and the international community that this
>>>> sort of behavior will not be tolerated by Congress.

>

>>>> "These are not just symbolic concerns; Kucinich raised the specter of
>>>> international involvement:

>

>>>> "How awful it would be if the Congress looks the other way and within
>>>> the next few years some nation decides to prosecute a member of the
>>>> Bush Administration for war crimes at a time when we clearly knew that
>>>> there was sufficient evidence to proceed with hearings?"...- Hide quoted text -

>

>>>> - Show quoted text -

>

>>> Kucinich said that he will bring the subject up on the floor every
>>> thirty days for the rest of the Bush term. I wonder if he could also
>>> fillerbuster? There's no guarantee that George Bush will leave office
>>> in January. Things are that dangerous. Bush's crimes are the same as
>>> Hitler. The worst crimes the world has experienced since Imperialism
>>> in Germany under Hitler. We no longer have a Republic we know have a
>>> 'Homeland.' Homeland security is the new SS. We can't be sure that
>>> Bush will leave. He killed all those Ameicans on 911. If he is not
>>> prosecuted the US Congress sets the bar low for the next creep in the
>>> white house doing the same things. Bush is also a monster, he and
>>> Condi Liza and the boys eagerly and rowdily had intense conferences on
>>> the extact details of how to torture their victims of their war of
>>> terror, going into ghoulish details about what to do next to
>>> detainees. These are the worst Imperialists to be shat out into the
>>> world since Hitler and Mussilini. You think they will leave power
>>> without a fight? So far what a century huh?

>

>> It won't come to pass.

>

>> 2 checks were paid to Karl Marx (and are displayed in the British
>> Museum) by a member of the same family that is behind this
>> international corporate/government cabal, which is also the same
>> family that runs your Communist and Socialist Parties.

>

>> Follow their tracks, and see for yourself how the so-called
>> 'capitalist' government and communism are two sides of the same coin.
>> Compare the manifesto to what is happening right now.- Hide quoted text -

>

>> - Show quoted text -

>
> Karl Marx was an English citizens so it's not surprising there would
> be a check signed to him by a Capitalist.

> Karl Marx didn't run a
> Socialist country. He was a journalist and a theoretician and a writer.