|
|
 Up |
|
  |
|
Author: JulieJulie Date: Jul 9, 2007 16:59
|
| |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 9, 2007 20:18
What I think is more interesting is Burleson's contract vs. D-Jack and
Engram. A lot of people have whined about him being overpaid when his
contract is heavily backloaded and he'll never see a dime of that money.
Burleson certainly hasn't been worth what we're paying him, but he's not
making the kind of cash some would like to believe.
Also interesting is, with all of Jackson's bitching about money, both his
base and cap number were significantly higher than Branch's and Burleson's.
BTW, let me know, Julie, when you're coming to town.
Hasta,
Curt Nelson
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark SchooleyMark Schooley Date: Jul 9, 2007 22:45
>
>
> What I think is more interesting is Burleson's contract vs. D-Jack and
> Engram. A lot of people have whined about him being overpaid when his
> contract is heavily backloaded and he'll never see a dime of that money.
> Burleson certainly hasn't been worth what we're paying him, but he's not
> making the kind of cash some would like to believe.
>
> Also interesting is, with all of Jackson's bitching about money, both his ...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Stephen TrapaniStephen Trapani Date: Jul 9, 2007 23:03
Mark Schooley wrote:
>>
>> What I think is more interesting is Burleson's contract vs. D-Jack and
>> Engram. A lot of people have whined about him being overpaid when his
>> contract is heavily backloaded and he'll never see a dime of that money.
>> Burleson certainly hasn't been worth what we're paying him, but he's not
>> making the kind of cash some would like to believe.
>>
>> Also interesting is, with all of Jackson's bitching about money, both his
>> base and cap number were significantly higher than Branch's and ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jimbo JonesJimbo Jones Date: Jul 10, 2007 00:24
On Jul 9, 7:59 am, Julie hotmail.com> wrote:
Just for fun, let's see who in the list were the ones that didn't live
upto their salaries, and the ones who exceeded their salaries in terms
of on field play.
First, the people who didn't live upto expectations:
First and foremost Shaun Alexander and his broken foot. He maybe
earned 2 or 3 of the 15 million he got, most of which came from his
signing bonus.
Floyd Womack and his 2 million, and 3 against the cap - I certainly
hope we aren't paying him anything close to that this season
|
| Show full article (2.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gerald ToddGerald Todd Date: Jul 10, 2007 01:38
> Did you know that Hasselbeck made 1/5 of what Shaun Alexander did last
> year?
If the team is winning, it doesn't matter. On the other hand......
(ominous music rising in the background....)
Gerald
Todd
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark SchooleyMark Schooley Date: Jul 10, 2007 03:15
"Stephen Trapani" nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:goxki.39$HT1.29@newsfe02.lga...> Mark Schooley wrote:
>>>
>>> What I think is more interesting is Burleson's contract vs. D-Jack and
>>> Engram. A lot of people have whined about him being overpaid when his
>>> contract is heavily backloaded and he'll never see a dime of that money.
>>> Burleson certainly hasn't been worth what we're paying him, but he's
>>> not making the kind of cash some would like to believe.
>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MelvinMelvin Date: Jul 11, 2007 07:45
On Jul 10, 2:28 pm, "Trakar" wrote:
> At least start out right, 2006 was our third consecutive NFC west title.
It's easy for him to forget the first one, since the Rams beat Seattle
three times that season. They were arguably the better team.
Melvin
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 11, 2007 19:57
> On Jul 10, 2:28 pm, "Trakar" wrote:
>> At least start out right, 2006 was our third consecutive NFC west title.
>
> It's easy for him to forget the first one, since the Rams beat Seattle
> three times that season. They were arguably the better team.
>
> Melvin
Arguably!
;-)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
