alt.sports.football.pro.sea-seahawks
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.sports.football.pro.sea-seahawks only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006    
total
alt.sports ... sea-seahawks Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  2007 opponents         


Author: John Phillips
Date: Jan 15, 2007 23:46

Well, since our season is over looking ahead to 07.

No soft schedule in 07.

Our schedule has some intriguing matchups. I cant wait for the Chicago
rematch in our house, and the SB XL rematch as well.

And, we will be hosting the defending NFC champions, and possible SB
champions.

Home
Arizona
St. Louis
San Francisco
New Orleans
Tampa Bay
Chicago
Baltimore
Cincinnati
Show full article (0.49Kb)
2 Comments
  hasselbeck         


Author:
Date: Jan 15, 2007 23:19

can you believe this, his hand was broke during the game and he didn't let
anyone know, he should have told wallace to get in there and finish the
bears off, instead he stayed in and flubled the 4th down hand off, and
couldn't do anything at all the 4th quarter. wallace should have been in
the game, we almost certainly would have won, selfish by hass??
9 Comments
  Re: What I'm thinking.........         


Author: akrem
Date: Jan 15, 2007 19:24

Bill wrote:

Of all the positions on the team with the possible exception of QB, that is the most stupid one for us to spend time and resources on at the present time. If you were GM, the only thing that I can think of good that would come of it is we'd be in the running for the 1st pick in the draft every year. I think what you're smoking is what's causing those dreams.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But those dreams come true.......

--
AkreM
http://akrem.com
Show full article (1.12Kb)
no comments
  It could be worse         


Author: unklbob
Date: Jan 15, 2007 18:40

alt . sports . football . pro . sd-chargers
1 Comment
  Re: Where's Denny Green when you need him?         


Author:
Date: Jan 15, 2007 18:07

nice

"Mike Kohary" wrote in message
news:gdemq2dlu28btfdhiq7s8o0cpee44tiq4g@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:16:43 -0800, Mike Kohary
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20...
Show full article (0.92Kb)
no comments
  What I'm thinking.........         


Author: akrem
Date: Jan 15, 2007 17:54

I would like us to somehow get our hands on that RB Adrian Peterson. I don't care how we do it, just get it done.

--
AkreM
http://akrem.com

I would like us to somehow get our hands on that RB
Adrian Peterson. I don't care how we do it, just get it
done.
 
 
 
-- AkreMhttp://akrem.com
24 Comments
  Re: Well damn...........         


Author: akrem
Date: Jan 15, 2007 17:53

"Melvin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168896341.508708.107650@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> On Jan 14, 11:15 pm, "akrem" comcast.net> wrote:
>> Like I said before....he isn't considered Great in my book. That's just
>> my
>> view. But in the game..he was ok.
>
> FROM:
> http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seahawks/story/6324355p-5513280c.html
>
> "Shaun Alexander picked up 108 yards on 26 carries, including a pair of
> touchdowns. A broken foot kept him sidelined much of the season, but he
> finished strong and his performance against the Bears was exceptional."
>
> ---
>
> Your "ok" is someone else's "exceptional."
> ...
Show full article (0.81Kb)
no comments
  Re: Great play call on 4th and 1, TERRIBLE EXECUTION         


Author: seahawk
Date: Jan 15, 2007 16:11

Squidly wrote:
> dinos...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Squidly wrote:
>>> Santolina chamaecyparissus wrote:
>>>> Stuart Angus Boeuf wrote:
>>>>> I STILL think that was the ONLY play call to make in this
>>>>> situation.
>>>>
>>>> Alas, no, Holmgren still hasn't quite figured out when to do this
>>>> and when not to. Punt them deep and with their wobbly QB you
>>>> still have a good chance to get the ball back at midfield, or get
>>>> a turnover or safety. It was the wrong time to go for fourth and
>>>> almost two yards.
>>>
>>> Unless it worked.
>>
>> Which it didn't, and we were unable to ever consistently convert
>> third-and-short all year, so it was somewhat of a nonsensical
>> decision.
> ...
Show full article (1.49Kb)
no comments
  a round of applause...         


Author: dinoscop
Date: Jan 15, 2007 15:46

I finally have a chance to post and before I read what the rest of you
fine people have said, I want to sum up yesterday's game and the season
by giving kudos to our guys for a very solid effort. They played hard,
they gutted it out despite being completely undermanned by injuries and
just plain inconsistency, and while they made the usual mistakes that
killed them all year, the fact that they could have (should have?) won
this game when they were such heavy underdogs makes for a decent end to
an otherwise pretty mediocre season.

All of us hoped for the best and I certainly thought we had more than a
fighting chance. Chicago ain't all that, as they showed, and we
certainly had our chances to put the game away. Still, while I feel
like a Seattle win yesterday would have led to a likely throttling at
the hands of a much better QB and more consistent offense next week in
New Orleans, I think the loss was an appropriate summation for the 2006
Seahawks -- just close enough to almost be pretty damn good, but not
quite.
Show full article (3.11Kb)
7 Comments
  Peter F&%%$King         


Author: Melvin
Date: Jan 15, 2007 14:07

I've been a defender of Peter King in this NG, but not anymore. After
Seattle's valiant effort against the No. 1 seed on their homefield, he
still ranks the Cowboys (who, by the way, lost last week to a certain
team in the northwest) ahead of the Seahawks.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/01/14/playoffs/2.html

Curt, what is it you always say about Peter King? :-)

Melvin
16 Comments
1 2 3