>I wish the Steelers *had* waited to talk to Rivera. I'm not high on
>Tomlin -- mostly from the Vikings' defense statistics. I thought that
>Rivera was a good candidate, but it's gonna be another two weeks.
>
> I guess I'd take new blood (Tomlin) over a Cowher clone (Grimm). The
> Cowboys can get the clone -- he'd actually be a pretty good fit in Dallas.
>
>

> I wish the Steelers *had* waited to talk to Rivera. I'm not high on
> Tomlin -- mostly from the Vikings' defense statistics. I thought that
> Rivera was a good candidate, but it's gonna be another two weeks.
>
> I guess I'd take new blood (Tomlin) over a Cowher clone (Grimm). The
> Cowboys can get the clone -- he'd actually be a pretty good fit in Dallas.
>
>
>

> I wish the Steelers *had* waited to talk to Rivera. I'm not high on
> Tomlin -- mostly from the Vikings' defense statistics. I thought that
> Rivera was a good candidate, but it's gonna be another two weeks.
>
> I guess I'd take new blood (Tomlin) over a Cowher clone (Grimm). The
> Cowboys can get the clone -- he'd actually be a pretty good fit in Dallas.
>
>
>

>
>"John Peterson" comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:F9qdnWq-DaJ1ZynYnZ2dnUVZ_oernZ2d@giganews.com...

>>I wish the Steelers *had* waited to talk to Rivera. I'm not high on
>>Tomlin -- mostly from the Vikings' defense statistics. I thought that
>>Rivera was a good candidate, but it's gonna be another two weeks.
>>
>> I guess I'd take new blood (Tomlin) over a Cowher clone (Grimm). The
>> Cowboys can get the clone -- he'd actually be a pretty good fit in Dallas.
>>
>>

>
>--Shit, when I read about Parcells retiring, I immediately thought to
>myself, the same exact thing. Those Cowgirls would pursue Rivera after he
>wins or loses the Superbowl. DAMMMIITTTTT!!!!!!!!1
>

> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:07:28 GMT, "#1

>>>

>>
>> Puhleeze.... let's not act like Rivera is the end-all be-all of
>> coaches.
>>
>> Wannstadt was the guy everybody wanted around here in '92...
>>
>> There are plenty of people in the league quoted as saying Tomlin is a
>> fantastic choice.

>
>I think Tomlin is a quality candidate, too. But Rivera also has some decent
>credentials. In fact, you could argue that, statistically, Rivera resume is
>better than Tomlin's. I just wished that the Steelers could have waited 2
>more weeks to talk to the guy and *then* made up their mind.
>

> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:33:02 -0700, "John Peterson"
> comcast.net> wrote:
>

>>>>

>>>
>>> Puhleeze.... let's not act like Rivera is the end-all be-all of
>>> coaches.
>>>
>>> Wannstadt was the guy everybody wanted around here in '92...
>>>
>>> There are plenty of people in the league quoted as saying Tomlin is a
>>> fantastic choice.

>>
>>I think Tomlin is a quality candidate, too. But Rivera also has some
>>decent
>>credentials. In fact, you could argue that, statistically, Rivera resume
>>is
>>better than Tomlin's. I just wished that the Steelers could have waited 2 ...

> "SteelerNation" SteelerNation.com> wrote in message
> news:s6dar2dvt943e5hnc9d1j3b3hjjsfubjbl@4ax.com...

>> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:33:02 -0700, "John Peterson"
>> comcast.net> wrote:
>>

>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> Puhleeze.... let's not act like Rivera is the end-all be-all of
>>>> coaches.
>>>>
>>>> Wannstadt was the guy everybody wanted around here in '92...
>>>>
>>>> There are plenty of people in the league quoted as saying Tomlin is a
>>>> fantastic choice.

>>>
>>>I think Tomlin is a quality candidate, too. But Rivera also has some
>>>decent
>>>credentials. In fact, you could argue that, statistically, Rivera resume ...

> wrote in message
> news:382ar2tanm367a9thj7m1gadvhn641du0s@4ax.com...

>> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:07:28 GMT, "#1 §T££L£R§ f@Ñ"
>> wrote:
>>
>>...