Up |
|
|
  |
Author: john0714john0714 Date: Oct 25, 2006 11:22
I think the Steeler fans this week might be unusually open to changes
in the overtime rules I am proposing. One possible change might be
simply to go to the college rules. Frankly every time not involving my
alma mater a college game I am watching on TV looks like it might end
tied in regulation I hope for it to do so. I want Memphis to win out
right:)
But suppose the NFL cannot go for this I propose "slow death." The way
it works is this, if at any point in the overtime the team that kicks
off initially scores first, they win right then.(This might...
|
| Show full article (1.54Kb) |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ±©The Mr. Brian (_!_) Owner ®³±©The Mr. Brian (_!_) Owner ®³ Date: Oct 25, 2006 11:34
john0714 wrote:
>
> Either of my proposals might have meant a Steeler's win last Sunday.
>
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: number one michael jackson fannumber one michael jackson fan Date: Oct 26, 2006 01:44
> I think the Steeler fans this week might be unusually open to changes
> in the overtime rules I am proposing. One possible change might be
> simply to go to the college rules. Frankly every time not...
|
| Show full article (2.02Kb) |
| 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: stebainstebain Date: Oct 26, 2006 07:05
>I think the Steeler fans this week might be unusually open to changes
> in the overtime rules I am proposing. One possible change might be
> simply to go to the college rules. Frankly every time not involving my
> alma mater a college game I am watching on TV looks like it might end
> tied in regulation I hope for it to do so. I want Memphis to win out
> right:)
>
> But suppose the NFL cannot go for this I propose "slow death." The way
> it works is this, if at any point in the overtime the team that kicks
> off initially scores first, they win right then.(This might encourage
> onside kicks.) But if the initial receiving team scores first they must
> kick off and the other team has a chance to tie them, in which case
> they kick off or get the lead in which case they win before they lose
> possession due to all the usual reasons such as turnovers and losing
> the ball on downs, etc. In case of the initilial receiving team scoring
> a safety, they have the other team kick to them as per usual, if they
> then score a touchdown with extra point they win right then and there
> because there are no three point conversions:) but anything less the ...
|
| Show full article (2.08Kb) |
| 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Billie BonesBillie Bones Date: Oct 26, 2006 10:26
>>I think the Steeler fans this week might be unusually open to changes
>> in the overtime rules I am proposing. One possible change might be
>> simply to go to the college rules. Frankly every time not involving my
>> alma mater a college game I am watching on TV looks like it might end
>> tied in regulation I hope for it to do so. I want Memphis to win out
>> right:)
>>
>> But suppose the NFL cannot go for this I propose "slow death." The way
>> it works is this, if at any point in the overtime the team that kicks
>> off initially scores first, they win right then.(This might encourage
>> onside kicks.) But if the initial receiving team scores first they must
>> kick off and the other team has a chance to tie them, in which case
>> they kick off or get the lead in which case they win before they lose
>> possession due to all the usual reasons such as turnovers and losing
>> the ball on downs, etc. In case of the initilial receiving team scoring ...
|
| Show full article (2.65Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: SargeSarge Date: Oct 26, 2006 15:06
I'd like to see them do away with O/T in regular season and preseason games.
I think O/T should be as an extra quarter(s) and the team ahead at the end
is the winner. Just like extra innings in baseball.
|
| |
| 6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: jjbinksjjbinks Date: Oct 26, 2006 16:01
I got an idea to fix overtime forever, on every level. No FG's allowed,
you need a safety or TD to win a tied game. Nobody could ever complain
if that were the case.
|
| |
| 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Billie BonesBillie Bones Date: Oct 26, 2006 16:10
>I got an idea to fix overtime forever, on every level. No FG's allowed,
> you need a safety or TD to win a tied game. Nobody could ever complain
> if that were the case.
>
I still don't like it. Both teams would have to have at least one
possession.
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: QuiGonQuiGon Date: Oct 26, 2006 18:48
>
> Either of my proposals might have meant a Steeler's win last Sunday.
You know what else might have resulted in a win..? If your moron coach
didn't waste his final timeout.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|