Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group

In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
bugs. They found nothing.

I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video, surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be using.

I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping" devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
believe our neighbours would permit this.

We paid Nationwide

You know how for the last several years (prior to this season) the Super
Bowl loser had failed to make the playoffs the next season?

Well this season the Seahawks made the playoffs, and the Steelers missed
the playoffs. That shows you that the Seahawks should have won the Super
Bowl, but were robbed by the refs.

Yeah....pay some lying asshole $40 million while foreign TA's teach 90%% of all
science courses for minimum wage.

Gotta love America's educational priorities!

Fixed your post for ya!
HTH

How about this for a scenario? Cowher thinks it is about the money, but
knows if he makes a decision to walk right away, his potential market value
drops because any potential employer will have to offer the Steelers draft
picks as compensation for attaining his rights. So Cowher decides to drag
his feet to see if he can get the Steelers to fire him, which would allow
him to walk free and clear.....

"jimpgh2002" xxnospamxx.com> wrote in message
news:comop299esbol7t16ctaqu7k2s7tntl9vq@4ax.com...

Good point.

~e.

On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:19:43 GMT, "The #1 Dallas Hater"
Dallas.com> wrote:

Okay, all the records have been wiped clean -- it's a fresh slate for all
you prognosticators!

I *still* don't have the feature working where it will show you the teams'
regular season record. Sorry about that. I keep telling myself (every
year) that I'm gonna fix that, but I haven't gotten around to it.

http://johnp.dyndns.org/Picks/Default.aspx

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2718940

I didn't realize Whiz was an Atlanta native. Boy, that'd be a pretty good
fit for him, I would think.

Personally, of all the candidates we've bandied about (Marvin Lewis, Grimm,
Whiz, Jimmy Johnson, etc.), I'd take the Whiz. I really liked what he did
during our Super Bowl run (and the weeks leading up to it) -- it was just an
impressive, fantastic, series of game-plans.

This year, I think Whiz was hamstrung by a reliable power back. There's no
question he was a *huge* Jerome Bettis fan, and I think he missed that
aspect of the offense. I thought the Closet Crapper might have been able to
fill that role, but he never really got enough carries to show what he could
do.

It doesn't seem like the organization has anyone in mind to replace him.

I'm racking my brain trying to think of a suitable replacement, and I can't.

If Cowher doesn't return, who the hell are they going to go after???

~e.