| Re: Who's the baddest of them all? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.sports.football.pro.oakraiders · Group Profile
Author: JufiJufi Date: Jun 16, 2008 10:25
"Nuclear Waste" mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:aqv5k.211086$yE1.10110@attbi_s21...>>
>> "Nuclear Waste" mchsi.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xs05k.154685$TT4.141728@attbi_s22...>>>
>>>>
>>>> Keep trying, though. It's always nice to see people attack the Pats.
>>>> Lately, it's been really, really funny.
>>>
>>> Unlike you, my autistic friend, I understand humor, braggadacio and
>>> sarcasm. Here's your *.
>>> NW
>>
>> Thanks. Too bad the Raiders can't even play good enough to earn one of
>> those. Like their last SB appearance. I wonder if Gruden was familiar
>> with their offensive signals? How else could TB's defense have scored as
>> many points as the Raiders "high powered offense?"
>
> Ah, yes, the same grasp of football history that you *s fans have of the
> rules. You see, we DID EARN three rings, unlike the *s.
By your own admission, cheating on the field, too. Color it up all you want:
"Three Time Superbowl Champion Patriots"
Deal with it. Deal with the reality. And then, with any luck, deal with
another Boston champ on Tuesday night. I hope...
| 
