|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Bob WhitesideBob Whiteside
Date: Jan 6, 2007 19:04
> I'll be interested in what happens in the polls on Monday. With the SC
loss
> the Ducks presumably would drop, but knocking off no. 1 ought to more than
> compensate, I would think.
>
> So what's the consensus here? Will they be in the top 10? Should they be?
The Bruins drop a couple of notches based on their loss to UO and their
fairly close game with OSU compared to USC beating UO and blowing out the
Beavers. The Ducks stay in the high teens for another week.
The Bruins have to be worried about taking on USC next Saturday. And the
Arizona game results will have a lot to do with where the Ducks should
really be ranked.
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Charles BeauchampCharles Beauchamp
Date: Jan 6, 2007 18:41
"Sean S" wrote in message
news:Xns98B0B56684373seansefnorg@216.196.97.131...
> "Greg Sumner" yahoo.com> laid this on me:>>
>> Those are the 6 I was thinking of. But I wasn't discounting anybody,
>> that's why I said "six good teams already" as I think more could
>> emerge. Also though, we could find out that some of these teams are
>> over-rated. Washington has a lot of growing to do and WSU and Oregon
>> could fall too.
>
> Are you trying to imply that Oregon could start the year good, maybe
> even exceeding expectations, get everyone's hopes up - and then crash like
> a lead balloon?
> Where on earth would you ever get such a crazy idea?
>
Turdishun baybee!
--
v/r Beau
Hey Saddam...so..howzit hangin?
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author:
Date: Jan 6, 2007 17:49
"Greg Sumner" yahoo.com> laid this on me:>
> Those are the 6 I was thinking of. But I wasn't discounting anybody,
> that's why I said "six good teams already" as I think more could
> emerge. Also though, we could find out that some of these teams are
> over-rated. Washington has a lot of growing to do and WSU and Oregon
> could fall too.
Are you trying to imply that Oregon could start the year good, maybe
even exceeding expectations, get everyone's hopes up - and then crash like
a lead balloon?
Where on earth would you ever get such a crazy idea?
Sean
>
> Greg.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author:
Date: Jan 6, 2007 17:22
"John Mulvey" efn.org> laid this on me:
> I'll be interested in what happens in the polls on Monday. With the SC
> loss the Ducks presumably would drop, but knocking off no. 1 ought to
> more than compensate, I would think.
>
> So what's the consensus here? Will they be in the top 10? Should they
> be?
>
> John
Top ten may be a tad hopeful. I think after splitting with the LA
schools, #18 or 17 is about right. The loss to SC was a close, tight game
to a team playing well (true, at home, but the league is tough this year),
and beating UCLA means something, they had been running roughshod over
everyone.
They'll likely end up #21 or 22. Gotta make room for a mediocre ACC
team somewhere.
Sean
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Plan DPlan D
Date: Jan 6, 2007 14:56
.. sitting in front of the TV watching it happen.
The first time was in 1970. UCLA had Wicks and Lowe, Oregon had Stan Love
(now Kevin's father, then the Beach Boy's first brother), Bill Drozdiak
(who's now a writer for the Washington Post), and Rusty Blair (who won the
game with clutch baseline jumpers); the "telecast" was from the campus cable
channel, PL3, which the local cable company picked up for the occasion, and
consisted of one black-and-white camera centered in the first balcony along
with another camera aimed at the scoreboard. I know it was black-and-white
because we had just got a new color TV which my mom insisted had to be
broken because the game wasnt in color.
The second time was in 1974, I watched the game at a friend's house but
can't remember much other than Ron Lee sliding across the floor, Bruce
Coldren hitting 25-footers from the baseline over and over and over again
and Walton looking like he'd just eaten a bug.
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Greg SumnerGreg Sumner
Date: Jan 6, 2007 12:41
Charles Beauchamp wrote:
> "Don Shennum" yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:VjDnh.443$kM1.40@newsfe11.phx...>>>
>>
>>> The Pac-10 is looking good this year. We've got six really good teams
>>> already with two legit top-10 teams in UCLA and Zona.
>>>
>> Just curious who the 6 are.
>>
>> 4 of them are obvious, who are the other 2?
>>
>> Methinks you are discounting Cal.
>
> UCLA, Southern Cal, Oregon, Zona, Washington and WSU
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
