|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: jslaterjslater Date: Feb 9, 2008 11:30
Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but definitely
a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
|
| |
|
| | 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: TerraholmTerraholm Date: Feb 9, 2008 12:41
> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but definitely
> a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the pacers....
;-)
--
Laurel T
"The only difference between me and
General Custer is that he didn't have to
watch the game films the next day"
A coach after a blow out loss
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: jslaterjslater Date: Feb 9, 2008 13:20
On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm" hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but definitely
>> a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
>
> They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the pacers....
> ;-)
>
> --
> Laurel T
> "The only difference between me and
> General Custer is that he didn't have to
> watch the game films the next day"
> A coach after a blow out loss
Oops! I'll attempt to fix the subject line. -- Joe
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TerraholmTerraholm Date: Feb 9, 2008 17:13
> On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm" hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but
>>> definitely a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
>>
>> They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the
>> pacers.... ;-)
>>
>
> Oops! I'll attempt to fix the subject line. -- Joe
Without Roy again today they are turning themselves into the pacers in the
Indiania gym...
--
Laurel T
"I told him,'Son, what is it with you. Is it ignorance or apathy?'
He said, 'Coach, I don't know and I don't care."
Frank Layden
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SkippyPBSkippyPB Date: Feb 10, 2008 08:33
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:13:31 -0800, "Terraholm"
hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm" hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but
>>>> definitely a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
>>>
>>> They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the
>>> pacers.... ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Oops! I'll attempt to fix the subject line. -- Joe
>
>Without Roy again today they are turning themselves into the pacers in the
>Indiania gym...
Trail Blazers had no answer for Granger who is a rising star in the
league and they couldn't crack the Pacer defense in the 3rd quarter.
|
| Show full article (1.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TerraholmTerraholm Date: Feb 10, 2008 12:14
SkippyPB wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:13:31 -0800, "Terraholm"
> hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm" hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but
>>>>> definitely a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. -- Joe
>>>>
>>>> They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the
>>>> pacers.... ;-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oops! I'll attempt to fix the subject line. -- Joe
>>
>> Without Roy again today they are turning themselves into the pacers
>> in the Indiania gym...
>
> Trail Blazers had no answer for Granger who is a rising star in the ...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Grey MattersGrey Matters Date: Feb 10, 2008 12:49
> SkippyPB wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:13:31 -0800, "Terraholm"
>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm"
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: TerraholmTerraholm Date: Feb 10, 2008 21:04
Grey Matters wrote:
>> SkippyPB wrote:
>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:13:31 -0800, "Terraholm"
>>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Feb 9, 3:41 pm, "Terraholm" hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Nice game by the bench. Yes, Portland was without Roy, but
>>>>>>> definitely a good game from Stuckey. Amir looked good too. --
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They were terrible... but you do not need to turn them into the
>>>>>> pacers.... ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|