|
|
Up |
|
  |
Author: KSKS
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:41
"BadgerBC" wrote:
> To me he was the most underrated Yankee of the Torre dynasty. And with
> apologies to Derek, Bernie was the best position player of truly a
> remarkable run.
You wait for the news. You intellectually know that this is the best thing
for the team. And yet to finally read it, I can't help but feel sad to know
that Bernie's career playing for the Yankees has come to an end. It just
doesn't seem all that long ago that he was the skinny, fast kid playing for
the Albany-Colonie Yankees.
" 'I have come to a place in my career where there are other things in my
life that have become just as important as baseball,' Williams told the
Journal-News. 'If this is the end, there are no regrets. I gave it my
best shot. One of the things I've always wanted was to gain the respect
from my teammates, and I think I've done that.' "
I don't think there's anyone who loves the game of baseball that doesn't
respect the player Bernie's been and the person that he is. The Yankees and
we fans were fortunate to have him grace the outfield for so many years.
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:37
lanman wrote:
>
> It depends on if they escalate and how. I don't see them doing
> anything flagrant like massing on the border.
No offense, but what you see is barely, no check that, its not relevant.
You haven't shown much of an understanding of the situation to this point.
> That's the type of war
> the US would love them to initiate.
I might be talking through my hat...but I would guess that that is
*exactly* the type of war the US would *not* want them to initiate at
this point. They already have some irons in the fire...
If you don't believe me, ask Hitler what happens when you spread
yourself too thin.
> Naturally, no one would deliberatrly destroy all the oil fields, but
> the threat has to give Iran's leaders pause.
If naturally no one would do it, why would it give Iran pause?
|
| Show full article (1.83Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:30
lanman wrote:
>
> I appreciate your patience. When I post a comment, it's mostly a
> recollection of something I've read or heard in some news medium at
> some time.
Shocking...
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:27
lanman wrote:
> No country in history has ever done more to protect
> civilian lives than the US in Iraq -
Wow. Again I say tell that to the families of the dead civilians. They
probably see it differently. Collateral damage is a term concocted to
make the aggressor feel better, not the victim.
And the US has a few Canadian lives on their side of the ledger
too...non-civilian ones at that.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:25
lanman wrote:
>
> These protections do little to protect the civil liberties of average
> Americans and do much to protect multi-national fraud and corruption,
> organized crime, foreign governments committing espionage, and
> international terrorists. Tell me how your personal privacy has been
> comprimised by the Patriot Act.
It hasn't. But that's not because the Patriot Act is good or bad.
Chances are good though, that many people have been affected and are
largely oblivious to it.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:24
lanman wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:39:52 -0500, smacdo nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> lanman wrote:
>>> Losing in Iraq will only embolden jihadis and ensure we have even more
>>> lining up to attack us in the future.
>
> Take a quick look at countries that have rolled out the welcome mat to
> Muslims. Denmark, France, Germany, and a host of others are under
> seige. If you're Canadian, you too have a problem with Islamists
> trying to censor any criticism of Islam and incorporate shariah law
> into your legal system.
I cannot possibly fathom the connection between what I said, and what
you replied. If I am missing something, please help me out.
Remember, I told you that I am amazed at the way some Americans think
that the way to quell anti-American sentiment is through continuing, and
winning, the war in Iraq.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:20
lanman wrote:
> You couldn't be more wrong.
How are you supposed to be taken seriously when you link to an article
that doesn't mention Iraq in defense of your ridiculous statement that
Iraqi prisoners like it there?
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: smacdosmacdo
Date: Jan 26, 2007 21:19
lanman wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:41:21 -0500, smacdo nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> lanman wrote:
>>> Most Iraqi prisoners love Club Gitmo. Their worst nightmare is being
>>> returned to Iraq.
>> I would love to know your source for this little gem...
Please note that the word Iraq does not appear ONCE in that story. So I
ask again...
How do you know most IRAQI prisoners love Club Gitmo and that their
worst nightmare is being returned to IRAQ?
(Hey, it was your statement, not mine)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: luxor1275bcluxor1275bc
Date: Jan 20, 2007 05:30
"Erasmus \"The Mannequin\" Brown" mofo.com> wrote:
>
>"BadgerBC" hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1169231736.392009.149310@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>: They are just terrible for baseball and the Evil Empire must be
>: dismantled for the good of th sport. Their big spending ways are just
>: ruining baseball and its popularity as they're driving the fans away
>: from the game. (N.B. The Yankees will not lose a single compensatory
>: pick in the 2007 amateur draft. I cannot ever remember an offseason
>: such as this after the emergence of free agency under George's watch.)
>:
>:
>:
>http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/mlb/article/0,2777,DRMN_23924_5290822,00.h...
>Last time the Yanks played in Coors, it messed the entire team up for two
>weeks.
They went 9-4 during those two weeks (June 21 to July 5).
What's so "messed up" about that?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: harrry limeharrry lime
Date: Jan 20, 2007 05:17
humbleaptience wrote:
> Looking scary next year. Sheff is still nasty, we just didn't need
> him. They will be serious contenders next year, great bullpen, great
> rotation, and adding Sheff to any batting order ads a whole new level
> of scary for opposing pitchers.
Sheff will always be "nasty" but who knows if he can still hit.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|