On May 31, 10:04 pm, McDuck comcast.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:35:45 -0400, Polarhound
> comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:03:28 -0400, Polarhound
>>> comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi's Katrina Continues. . . wrote:
>>>>> Sadly, no end in site to to this "man-made disaster" - the Obambi's
>>>>> Precedency. . .
>>>>> TOTALLY OVER HIS HEAD!!!
>>>> How long until he finally figures out that when you a President, it is
>>>> no longer acceptable to vote "Present" or treat each problem like a
>>>> college freshman term paper?
>>> Yes, Obama has to learn that a president, to be any good at his job,
>>> needs to know how to repair oil spills a mile under the sea, even if
>>> no one else knows ho to do that. I'm sure Reagan knew how to fix oil
>>> spills, or not.
>>Just like Bush was supposed to know how to completely abolish
> You think THAT is a useful analogy.
Which is why, McDuck, the conversation should end right there.
> Bush took some criticism for
> Katrina that was undeserved. His flyover, for example, was not
> evidence of indifference. But he was rightly criticized for putting a
> person in charge of relief ("Nice job, Brownie") who had no experience
> at all at such relief and who allowed a top federal agency to decline
> radically. The federal government was supposed to provide assistance
> to victims of hurricanes, and other presidents (remember Mr. Clinton)
> had done it very well. The government is not supposed to be able to
> stop deep-sea oil leaks.
> Obama is getting some criticism from the Left for not being negative
> enough about off-shore drilling. Fine, but the Right was yelling
> "drill, baby, drill, so that is not a criticism they are in position
> to make.