|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Video61Video61 Date: May 12, 2008 12:15
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080512/china_economy.html
i wonder how much growth there really is in china. i bet a large
portion of their measurement, is pure inflation. china is a larger
economic bubble than the current commodities market, and the recent
housing market.
China's inflation rises to almost 12-year high
Monday May 12, 3:00 pm ET
By Joe Mcdonald, AP Business Writer
Olympics looming, China battles highest inflation in almost 12 years,
but may be hard to tame
BEIJING (AP) -- China's inflation almost climbed to a 12-year high in
April, swamping official efforts to cool surging living costs that
could provoke unrest ahead of the Beijing Olympics.
The government, which took further steps Monday to tame the inflation,
faces the possibility of more sharp price hikes, some analysts warned.
"Underlying inflationary pressures remain undiminished," Goldman Sachs
economists Yu Song and Hong Liang said in a report.
The government ordered banks to increase their reserves for a fourth
time this...
|
| Show full article (4.67Kb) |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Video61Video61 Date: May 12, 2008 13:54
On May 12, 2:37 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:
> Nice article about the efficacy of trade barriers and government
> control of an economy.
> --
nice try, but one could flip that around, and most probably be right.
china operates the way western capitalists want it to. otherwise, why
would they pour in trillions of dollars of investments into
exploitation of chinas labor force and environment for the purpose of
under cutting western labor.
that investment is with open eyes of the chinese governments police
state tactics on their own citizens. what i am really describing is
fascism, coupled with western plutocracy.
> Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: alexyalexy Date: May 12, 2008 14:27
>On May 12, 2:37 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:
>>> Nice article about the efficacy of trade barriers and government
>> control of an economy.
>> --
>
> nice try, but one could flip that around, and most probably be right.
You mean by saying that they don't have trade barriers or government
control of the economy? No, I don't think that would be right.
>china operates the way western capitalists want it to.
Really? What western capitalist has said that they want the China
market closed to goods and services from the west?
> otherwise, why
>would they pour in trillions of dollars of investments into
>exploitation of chinas labor force and environment for the purpose of
>under cutting western labor.
The answer to that should be obvious.
|
| Show full article (1.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Video61Video61 Date: May 12, 2008 16:58
On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>On May 12, 2:37 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>
>>> Nice article about the efficacy of trade barriers and government
>>> control of an economy.
>>> --
>
>> nice try, but one could flip that around, and most probably be right.
>
> You mean by saying that they don't have trade barriers or government
> control of the economy? No, I don't think that would be right.
>
nice try again. they are run for western capitalists.
>>china operates the way western capitalists want it to.
>
> Really? What western capitalist has said that they want the China
> market closed to goods and services from the west?
>
|
| Show full article (2.07Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: alexyalexy Date: May 13, 2008 09:44
>On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>> otherwise, why
>>>would they pour in trillions of dollars of investments into
>>>exploitation of chinas labor force and environment for the purpose of
>>>under cutting western labor.
>>
>> The answer to that should be obvious.
>>
>
> then why did you say this,
>"> Really? What western capitalist has said that they want the China
>> market closed to goods and services from the west?"
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Video61Video61 Date: May 13, 2008 10:00
On May 13, 11:44 am, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>>> otherwise, why
>>>>would they pour in trillions of dollars of investments into
>>>>exploitation of chinas labor force and environment for the purpose of
>>>>under cutting western labor.
>
>>> The answer to that should be obvious.
>
>> then why did you say this,
>>"> Really? What western capitalist has said that they want the China
>>> market closed to goods and services from the west?"
>
> Try to get your mind around the distinction between imports and
> exports. It should be obvious why producers pour investments into
> China for cheaper production. In what way do you think that conflicts
> with my question about what western capitalists you are talking about
> who say they want the Chinese market closed to goods and services from
> the west? ...
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: starcadestarcade Date: May 13, 2008 11:44
On May 12, 4:58Â pm, Vide...@ tcq.net wrote: > On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:
>>>>On May 12, 2:37 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>
>>>> Nice article about the efficacy of trade barriers and government
>>>> control of an economy.
>>>> --
>
>>> nice try, but one could flip that around, and most probably be right.
>
>> You mean by saying that they don't have trade barriers or government
>> control of the economy? No, I don't think that would be right.
>
> Â nice try again. they are run for western capitalists.
I don't know whether you'd take this as a support or a refutation,
but, right now, China is being run to prop up Western capitalists and
capitalism (or at least the sham it's become).
|
| Show full article (2.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Video61Video61 Date: May 13, 2008 16:23
On May 13, 1:44 pm, starc...@ yahoo.com wrote: > On May 12, 4:58 pm, Vide...@ tcq.net wrote:
> >> On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>
>>>>On May 12, 2:37 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>
>>>>> Nice article about the efficacy of trade barriers and government
>>>>> control of an economy.
>>>>> --
>
>>>> nice try, but one could flip that around, and most probably be right.
>
>>> You mean by saying that they don't have trade barriers or government
>>> control of the economy? No, I don't think that would be right.
>
>> nice try again. they are run for western capitalists.
>
> I don't know whether you'd take this as a support or a refutation, ...
|
| Show full article (2.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Larry HewittLarry Hewitt Date: May 13, 2008 18:07
> On May 13, 11:44 am, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>>On May 12, 4:27 pm, alexy asbry.net> wrote:>>>>> otherwise, why
>>>>>would they pour in trillions of dollars of investments into
>>>>>exploitation of chinas labor force and environment for the purpose of
>>>>>under cutting western labor.
>>
>>>> The answer to that should be obvious.
>>
>>> then why did you say this,
>>>"> Really? What western capitalist has said that they want the China
>>>> market closed to goods and services from the west?"
>>
>> Try to get your mind around the distinction between imports and
>> exports. It should be obvious why producers pour investments into
>> China for cheaper production. In what way do you think that conflicts
>> with my question about what western capitalists you are talking about ...
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
