|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Jul 22, 2007 17:47
On Jul 22, 4:32 pm, Kurt Nicklas bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Jul 22, 1:24 pm, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote:
> >
>> Impeachment is the Only Option!
>
>> by Milt Shook
>
> Bring it on, Shookie.
Knickers is apparently yet another wingnut who has no clue that the
more they allow Bush to pull this shit without complaint, the more
they certify their own demise.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Jeffrey TurnerJeffrey Turner Date: Jul 22, 2007 18:25
zzpat wrote:
>
>>
>> Honest to God, what does someone have to do to be impeached by these
>> Democrats?
>
>
>
> Democrats know that impeachment would unit the GOP and that's the last
> thing they want so they're leaving impeachment off the table. The
> constitution demand impeachment but impeachment would hurt the
> Democratic Party.
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: SteveSteve Date: Jul 22, 2007 18:45
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:45:13 -0000, milt.shook@ gmail.com wrote:
>On Jul 22, 7:28 pm, David Johnston block.net> wrote:>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:14:06 -0700, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote: >>>On Jul 22, 3:26 pm, David Johnston block.net> wrote:>>>> On...
|
| Show full article (2.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: zzpatzzpat Date: Jul 22, 2007 22:07
Jeffrey Turner wrote:
>>
>> Democrats know that impeachment would unit the GOP and that's the last
>> thing they want so they're leaving impeachment off the table. The
>> constitution demand impeachment but impeachment would hurt the
>> Democratic Party.
>
> We see what happened to the opposition party after the last two
> presidents to face impeachment. Even if it did "unite" the Republicans,
> they are still way outnumbered by the Democrats and independents. I
> don't see how doing something decisive that 40%% of the country already
> favors is going to hurt them.
>
> --Jeff
>
Just about every Democrat and Independent knows Bush is a criminal and
the worst president in history but Dems have done nothing about it.
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kurt NicklasKurt Nicklas Date: Jul 23, 2007 03:17
On Jul 22, 8:47 pm, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote: > On Jul 22, 4:32 pm, Kurt Nicklas bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 1:24 pm, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote: >
>
>>> Impeachment is the Only Option!
>
>>> by Milt Shook
>
>> Bring it on, Shookie.
>
> Knickers is apparently yet another wingnut who has no clue that the
> more they allow Bush to pull this shit without complaint, the more
> they certify their own demise.
So, like I said, Shookie...bring it on.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 23, 2007 06:25
On Jul 23, 1:24 am, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote:
Because the people who own Congress don't want it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 23, 2007 06:28
On Jul 23, 2:13 am, John Black texas.net> wrote:>> There is something I don't understand about the current crop of
>> Democrats in Congress. Why are they so reticent to discuss
>> impeachment?
>
> Because they have no case. If they claimed Bush lied about Iraq they do
> not want to endure day after day after day of quotes being read back to
> them of all of them saying the exact same things as Bush. People might
> realize they are full of shit (those who already don't).
>
> John Black
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
True. But they should impeach him for that "signing statement"
bullshit.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 23, 2007 06:40
On Jul 23, 8:45 am, milt.sh...@ gmail.com wrote: >
>
> Like stricter laws with regard to corruption, for one. An end to the
> legalized bribery that goes on these days. An end to the free ride
> lobbyists have been getting.
The Democrats are in favor of these things. Joe Sixpak has no clue.
> New laws that spell out in greater detail
> exactly what the president can and cannot keep secret...
What difference does this make if the President doesn't give a shit
about laws?
>
> But most of all, it will set new standards for impeachment, and turn
> it back into a tool for getting rid of morons and cheats.
>
There will never be a "standard" for impeachment.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Jul 23, 2007 06:41
On Jul 23, 3:26 am, David Johnston block.net> wrote:> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:13:36 -0500, John Black texas.net>
> wrote:
>>>> There is something I don't understand about the current crop of
>>> Democrats in Congress. Why are they so reticent to discuss
>>> impeachment?
>
>>Because they have no case.
>
> No, having a case or not is irrelevant. It doesn't matter what kind
> of case you might have when you don't have the votes.
I used to think that. But we should impeach him to show the world
that most of the US is opposed to what he is doing. A majority vote
would be good enough.
But the real reason he won't be impeached is because the Ds and Rs bat
for the same team.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SomeonetoblameSomeonetoblame Date: Jul 23, 2007 07:43
3633 Dead:
Not dead (abortion kills nobody!), in jail (it's not punishment, it's
"rehab"), or a slave (if Discovery Channel says Lincoln was a liberal,
he must be!)? Thank a liberal!
How about this:
Mom didn't abort you, not able to kill another person because your in
that bad, bad jail, member of the political party that fought to
abolish slavery? Thank a conservative.
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
More like: Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to pay an even higher
percentage than you JUST because they make more.
|
| |
| 9 Comments |
|
|
|
|
