1. Defeating the right-wing agenda of the Bush Administration.

2. Winning a wide-ranging program of reforms that put the well being
of the people before private profits.

3. Eventually replacing big business with labor and its allies as the
dominant power so as to insure that the rights, economic security and
expanding needs of the people become the overriding concern of
society.

In article
<3984be25-1e04-4e64-b00a-14de8c84f7d4@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Kurt Nicklas bellsouth.net> wrote:

Left-winger here. Let me take a gander:

Not applicable. The above is not a platform; it's a metaphor.

That's far to vague to be part of a platform. The current
administration's own actions have on occasion had the same intent. The
invasion if Iraq, for example. I'm paying for that mess with money that
I could otherwise use to increase the profit of a private company.

That one has many built-in assumptions and conclusions. Not sure where
you're going with this one.

On May 8, 9:40 pm, Kurt Nicklas bellsouth.net> wrote:

The above isn't a platform. It's a list of misconceptions about what
you think "libb'rulls" stand for.

For example, #3... why would anyone want labor to "dominate" anything,
anymore than we want the corporate power to "dominate" now? That's
just insane. What we'd like to see is workers with more power to
negotiate the price they charge for their work. The country worked
better when we did that... people could afford to live back then...

On Fri, 9 May 2008 02:46:45 -0700 (PDT), milt.shook@gmail.com wrote:

"4067 Dead" finestplanet.com> wrote in message
news:v6p8241pepmjofqtlq35h1k6ht1tfrcds4@4ax.com...

...and that's just a bit obnoxious, if you ask me. Certainly pointless.

On May 9, 10:51 am, 4067 Dead finestplanet.com> wrote:

On 9 mei, 03:40, Kurt Nicklas bellsouth.net> wrote:

In the Netherlands "Liberals" are considered rightwingers, so there
you go!
But actually this is a bit of an ill-constructed agenda.

#1 is a very negative approach, assuming everything the Bush
administration seeks to accomplish is evil. Of course it is not. One
can disagree with much of it, and one can disagree with alll of the
ways in which Bush&Co try to do it But it is rather a silly idea to
presume evertything that a man who has won half of the US votes twice
in a row only wants to do evil things.

On Mon, 12 May 2008 03:15:06 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
bellsouth.net> wrote:

On May 12, 8:49 am, 4075 Dead finestplanet.com> wrote:

On May 12, 7:58 am, "pba...@worldonline.nl"
wrote:

Why you are talking about liberals here, Peter, I do not know.

Well, that's the CP-USA for you!