alt.society.liberalism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.society.liberalism only
 
Advanced search
May 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
 123456 18
78910111213 19
14151617181920 20
21222324252627 21
28293031    22
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006 2005
total
alt.society.liberalism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: is everyone this dumb?         


Author: Nauvoo Expositor
Date: May 31, 2007 23:48

On May 31, 11:00�pm, "Taxi Driver" FoxNews.net>
wrote:
> "lubow" lubow-industries.com> wrote in message
>
> news:lQK7i.4348$aW5.594@trndny09...
>
>>> NASA administrator Michael Griffin is drawing the ire of some of his
>>> agency's scientists after apparently downplaying the need to combat
>>> global warming.
>
>> Do you really believe everyone is as stupid as you are?
>> Yup...
>
>> How about if we go above NASA and ask Dick Cheney?
>
>> --
>> Lubow
>
> You know what's utterly amazing?
no comments
  Re: #Cindy Sheehan driven out of public life -- by DEMOCRATIC party hacks!         


Author: Foxtrot
Date: May 31, 2007 23:39

"Phlip" yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>I have been called every despicable name
>>
>> Boohoo you dingbat. After all of the vitriolic things you said about
>> Bush and others, it takes real nerve for you to whine about your
>> self-inflicted problems.
>
>Cite?
>
>Or are you mindlessly reciting talk-show host verbiage?

You're denying that calling him a war criminal was vitriolic?
no comments
  Re: Cheney Invaded Iraq Knowing It Would Fail         


Author: Foxtrot
Date: May 31, 2007 23:30

Mitchell Holman comcast.com> wrote:
>Foxtrot null.com> wrote
>> Mitchell Holman comcast.com> wrote:
>>> A politician flip-flopped.
>>>
>>> Well, we could NEVER support THAT, now could we...........
>>>
>>>FLIP: Bush says we are winning the war in Iraq
>>>FLOP: Bush says we are not winning the war in Iraq
>>
>> You're defending the battleax by comparing her with Bush?!?
>
> Since you haven't noticed despite many
>repetitions, I am not defending either one.

Pardon moi! You deflected criticism of the battleax by saying that
Bush has similar shortcomings. Feel better?
no comments
  Re: Making less than dad did         


Author: Foxtrot
Date: May 31, 2007 23:21

David Johnston block.net> wrote:
>>> America should get rid of things that drive up the cost of doing
>>> business here like labor unions, excessive regulations and
>>> frivolous lawsuits (these job busters are all results of liberalism,
>>> since you want to bring politics into the discussion).
>
>Bring politics into the discussion? What four groups is it being
>posted to?

No problem discussing politics but the original CNN article didn't
attribute the lower wages to Repubs. That was spin by the previous
poster.
no comments
  Re: Making less than dad did         


Author: Clave
Date: May 31, 2007 23:17

"Foxtrot" null.com> wrote in message
news:p3ev53l9ejfb88ttkkonatunebb53l9njs@4ax.com...
> "Clave" cablespeed.com> wrote:
>
>>"Foxtrot" null.com> wrote
>>> "Clave" cablespeed.com> wrote:
>>>>"Foxtrot" null.com> wrote
>>>>> Neither of them would be where they are without daddy, Knave.
>>>>
>>>>Not the point, Trots.
>>>
>>> Being powerful because of whose crotch you squirted out from
>>> *IS* the point, Knave.
>>
>>Again you choose to miss the point.
>
> No you're missing the point, Knave:
>
>>> Answer the question. How is the way that Bush rose to power
>>> different from how Al Grrrr and Chappaquiddick Teddy rose to ...
Show full article (1.04Kb)
no comments
  Re: Making less than dad did         


Author: Foxtrot
Date: May 31, 2007 23:15

"Clave" cablespeed.com> wrote:
>"Foxtrot" null.com> wrote
>> "Clave" cablespeed.com> wrote:
>>>"Foxtrot" null.com> wrote
>>>> Neither of them would be where they are without daddy, Knave.
>>>
>>>Not the point, Trots.
>>
>> Being powerful because of whose crotch you squirted out from
>> *IS* the point, Knave.
>
>Again you choose to miss the point.

No you're missing the point, Knave:
>> Answer the question. How is the way that Bush rose to power
>> different from how Al Grrrr and Chappaquiddick Teddy rose to
>> power?
>Perhaps neither Gore nor Kennedy would be *exactly* where they are now
>without their families' money; the difference is that Bush wouldn't be
>*anywhere* without his.
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
  Re: Gay male Prostitutes Sleep with Bush         


Author: Foxtrot
Date: May 31, 2007 23:07

"Peacenik" hotmail.com> wrote:
>"John" nospam.com> wrote
>> Remeber Jeff Gannon / James Guckert?
>
>I've always wondered why Republicans are so vocally anti-gay and
>anti-prostitution, yet at the same time exhibit no shame in the fact that
>the gay prostitute GannonGuckert visited the White House on numerous
>occasions.

Isolated incident, Chrissy. Generally Repubs scorn the spreading of
homosexuality but Dems want fags to teach children that cornholing
each other is an "alternative lifestyle".

We libertarians believe that freaks can screw 120 volt light sockets
if they want but keep it to themselves. We also believe that all
victimless crimes including prostitution should be legalized.
no comments
  Re: Gandalf Grey, Covering for Klansmen         


Author: Kaarl Hungus
Date: May 31, 2007 23:06

"The Lone Weasel" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99426DC6469Cloneweaselyhdc@204.153.245.131...

: YOU'RE NOT BLACK. You're just a mutt like the rest of us,
: Jumbles.

YOU'RE NOT THIN. You're grossly overweight, and are simply unwilling to
stop eating.

: So here's what I said, which shows that Jumble Jim, aka
: "Christopher Morton" simply succeeded in making me angry
: enough to use racial language in a satirical, mocking way
: against him, not against anybody else.
:
: Jumbles then lifted the most inflammatory part of my post out
: of context, to make it easily misunderstood.

It's the sheer creativity that went into your choice of language that makes
it obvious that you're harboring some serious, deep-seated racial hatred.
Is it their lips that you hate most about black people, Lee? Do you
perceive them as eating their own boogers and having sex with monkeys? In
this case, I dare say your words are truly a window to your thoughts.

While we're at it, consider the following quote, this one from 2002:
Show full article (1.91Kb)
no comments
  Re: #Gore: special interests are "out of control"         


Author: Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )
Date: May 31, 2007 22:55

Taxi Driver wrote:
>
> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:465FAF1A.1AE77FC3@yahoo.co.uk...
>>
>>
>> 3475 Dead wrote:
>>>
>>> http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Gore_defends_record_I_havent_been_0531.html
>>>
>>> Gore: Special interests are 'out of control'
>>> David Edwards and Muriel Kane
>>> Published: Thursday May 31, 2007
>>>
>>> Print This Email This
>>>
>>> In an interview on CBS's Early Show on Thursday, former Vice-President
>>> Al Gore was asked about pressure from coal interests to have the US
>>> government not only pay for the building of coal liquification plants
>>> but order 25 years worth of fuel in advance. "That would be a horrible ...
Show full article (1.22Kb)
no comments
  Re: The Pseudologia Of Jerky Klutz..         


Author: Kaarl Hungus
Date: May 31, 2007 22:41

"Kurt Lochner" NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465F6EAE.459721EF@NOSPAMhotmail.com...
: "jerky klutz" onenet.net> whined and opined:
: >
: A brief introduction to Klutz Pseudo-Logic
:
: 1. Any and all statements made by Jerky Klutz are logically valid.

1. Any and all commands uttered by Iris Lochner-Harrington are instantly and
willingly obeyed by young Kurtsy.

: 2. Any and all statements made by anyone else are logically false.

2. Any and all statements made by Iris Lochner-Harrington are to be treated
as absolutely and unquestionably true, no matter how ludicrous or outlandish
they may be. This is because Iris, despite her advanced dementia, still
possesses the physical strength of a silverback gorilla.

: 3. Unlike mathematical or Aristotelian logic, Jerkian logic can,
: and IS appallingly systemic with all verbal communication about
: imagined events in the 'world' of Jerky Klutz.
Show full article (1.73Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9