|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Free LunchFree Lunch
Date: Dec 10, 2006 16:10
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:01:01 -0600, in alt.atheism
"nativetexan_1" yahoo.com> wrote in
<3t%%eh.18$Mz6.24601@news.sisna.com>:>
>"Mark K. Bilbo" wrote in message
>news:w7CdneWJ_LaT9OHYnZ2dnUVZ_tfinZ2d@giganews.com...>> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:10:09 -0600, nativetexan_1 wrote:
>>> You have no right to anything if it takes the assets of another without
>>> their permission, notwithstanding what the Supreme Court has had to say
>>> about it.
>>
>> Oh? Planning on the overthrow of the government any time soon?
>
>No, but the Supreme Court is made up of 9 guys/gals whose opinions are
>little better than mine or your's. With the number of 5-4 and 6-3
>decisions, it is obvious that they can't agree on the meaning of the
>Constitution, legislation, or treaties...
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Free LunchFree Lunch
Date: Dec 10, 2006 16:08
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:58:33 -0600, in alt.atheism
"nativetexan_1" yahoo.com> wrote in
news.sisna.com>:>
>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>news:3l3nn2d8ttl1oho0dt1su8fg38bc9fn50n@4ax.com...>> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:10:09 -0600, in alt.atheism
>>>You have no right to anything if it takes the assets of another without
>>>their permission,
>>
>> Why not? Is there no right to have a government?
>
>Our federal government has power to tax for the COMMON good, not for support
>of the individual.
Taking care of those who cannot take care of themselves is for the
common good. Rand hated people. Don't follow her example.
>If you disagree, please point out the Constitutional
>clause that gives the fed. gov. the power to take one's assets to give to
>another.
|
| Show full article (3.85Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: A Brick in the WallA Brick in the Wall
Date: Dec 10, 2006 16:02
"Morton Davis" go.com> wrote in message
news:a51fh.266487$FQ1.179417@attbi_s71...>
> "yossarian" chaos.org> wrote in message
> news:fdednYhql9kTwOHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com...>>
>> "Amanda Williams" fu.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns989568B80716Cfubar@63.218.45.254...>>> "Billary/2008" vastrightwingconspiracy.gov> allegedly
>>> said in news:bLUeh.4018$Q36.2302@trnddc08:
>>>>>>> Looks like we're going to invite (ie have) Hitlery for lunch!
>>>> Billary
>>>> Tampa, FL
>>>> <><><>
>>>> BARACK THE BABY
>>>>
>>>> By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
>>>>
>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Johnny AsiaJohnny Asia
Date: Dec 10, 2006 16:02
Israeli government worst labor law violator: report
Sun Dec 10, 3:50 PM ET
JERUSALEM (AFP) - Ninety-two percent of Israeli employers violate labor laws
with impunity, according to a report published by the Association for Civil
Rights in Israel.
The report, based on Ministry of Trade and Industry figures, said the
government is one of the leading violators -- systematically depriving
workers of their basic rights and cash benefits.
New immigrants, especially those from the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia,
are particularly vulnerable to exploitation, as are Palestinian workers from
the West Bank and Gaza Strip, foreign laborers, women and minors, the report
found.
It rapped the Ministry of Industry and Commerce for employing just 200
mostly part-time inspectors to enforce all Israeli labor laws nationwide. Of
those, just 18 are dedicated to protecting workers' rights, the report
added.
The 100-page report -- "Working Without Dignity" -- was published Sunday to
mark the start of international Human Rights Week.
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: DanaDana
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:31
The problem with Democrats
Liberals may be well-meaning, but that is about all they are
by PAUL D. MILLER
I am rabid environmentalist and care passionately about the poor. Yet
I would sooner pull out a constitutionally protected handgun and
shoot myself while chain smoking, eating red meat, and conducting a
painful experiment on a cute bunny rabbit than become a Democrat.
Here is why I am not a liberal:
Liberalism is simplistic. Whenever there is a problem, liberals
define it as a tragedy of the commons or an example of the private
sector under providing public goods, or make it an issue of rights.
The...
|
| Show full article (3.04Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:26
Matt wrote:
>
> David Hartung wrote:
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> "Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')"
>>> yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:457C592B.4FC04515@yahoo.co.uk:
>>>>>>>
>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> ROFLMAO Even the Iraqi Government is telling the liberal backed ISG
>>> to
>>>>>> f-off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Someone, somewhere, cares what the Iraqi government
>>>>> (cowering in their bunkers as the country descends into
>>>>> chaos) thinks? ...
|
| Show full article (2.47Kb) |
|
20 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:23
David Hartung wrote:
>
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> "Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')"
>> yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:457C592B.4FC04515@yahoo.co.uk:
>>>>>
>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> ROFLMAO Even the Iraqi Government is telling the liberal backed ISG
>> to
>>>>> f-off.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Someone, somewhere, cares what the Iraqi government
>>>> (cowering in their bunkers as the country descends into
>>>> chaos) thinks?
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:21
Mitchell Holman wrote:
>
> "Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')"
> yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:457C592B.4FC04515@yahoo.co.uk:
> >>
>>
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> ROFLMAO Even the Iraqi Government is telling the liberal backed ISG
> to
>>>> f-off.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Someone, somewhere, cares what the Iraqi government
>>> (cowering in their bunkers as the country descends into ...
|
| Show full article (2.37Kb) |
|
8 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:17
Adam Albright wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:05:32 -0800, "Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis,
> wouldn't that be nice?')" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>The side that faces away from Earth is another good part but that will
>>have to wait for better storage solutions or nuclear power.
>
> A great place to transport all right wing loons. Pack your bags.
>
Unfortunately for you, they'd still allow Conservatives to post to
usenet through a relay at the Moon north or south poles.
--
He and Evie soon fell into a conversation of the "No, I didn't; yes, you
did" type--conversation which, though fascinating to those who are
engaged in it, neither desires nor deserves the attention of others.
-+E.M. Forster, "Howards End"
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')Bill Bonde ('Anyone for tennis, wouldn't that be nice?')
Date: Dec 10, 2006 14:15
2924 Dead wrote:
Sounds about on par for Old Dems too.
--
He and Evie soon fell into a conversation of the "No, I didn't; yes, you
did" type--conversation which, though fascinating to those who are
engaged in it, neither desires nor deserves the attention of others.
-+E.M. Forster, "Howards End"
|
| |
|
4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
