|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: The WeaselThe Weasel
Date: Dec 23, 2006 23:27
Gandalf Grey wrote:
>> Gandalf Grey wrote:
>>>> Gandalf Grey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How come "never pays everyone" does not show up as my quote on Google?
>>>
>>> Because you changed your nym....note the NNTP numbers
>>>
>>> Once again, you demonstrate that you're a flaming egg-sucking liar.
>>>
>>> From: luvdatbobcat@ yahoo.com
>>> Message-ID: <1166822769.022337.290480@ 79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.179.142.168 >>
>> How come "never pays everyone" does not show up as my quote on Google?
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.84Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Wayne ThroopWayne Throop
Date: Dec 23, 2006 23:03
: James A. Donald echeque.com>
: Apples to oranges.
Mitochondrial DNA to mitochondrial DNA.
: You are comparing a divergence in particular very tiny fragment of the
: genome, presumably selected for its usefulness in distinguishing
: spotted owls from barred owls, with divergence in the genome as a
: whole.
No, the DNA is presumably selected because it's in the mitochondria.
And that has nothing at all to do with whether it's useful in
distinguishing strains of owls. It is useful, however, in tracking how
far back common ancestors were. Essentially, the owls' are further back
than the humans.
: The fact that someone can reliably find a very small DNA fragment that
: shows a large and consistent difference between one group and another
: does make a different species.
Except that that's not what they did. This mistake of yours may be
related to your statistical innumeracy. You should get that checked.
Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: James A. DonaldJames A. Donald
Date: Dec 23, 2006 22:44
> : James A. Donald echeque.com> But you did not
> : in fact provide information on the similarity of
> : spotted owls and barred owls at a genetic level,
> : though you may have believed that you did.
Wayne Throop
> That turns out not to be the case. (I'm assuming a
> plural "you".)
>
> From: "Gene Ward Smith" gmail.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1166482063.243171.323000@48g2000cwx.googlegroups. >> "Mitochondrial DNA sequences (524 base pairs)
> indicated large divergence between Barred and
> Spotted Owls (13.9%%).
|
| Show full article (1.83Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: 2968 Dead2968 Dead
Date: Dec 23, 2006 22:09
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6300630,00.html
Schwarzenegger Breaks Leg While Skiing
Sunday December 24, 2006 5:46 AM
By MARCUS WOHLSEN
Associated Press Writer
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger broke his
leg while skiing with his family Saturday morning in Sun Valley,
Idaho, a spokesman said.
Schwarzenegger, 59, was taken to a hospital for X-rays and was
discharged with a fracture to his right femur, said Adam Mendelsohn,
the governor's Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications.
He will have surgery to repair the bone when he returns to Los
Angeles, Mendelsohn said. The governor remained at his Sun Valley home
Saturday night and still planned to spend Christmas there.
No one else was involved in the accident, Mendelsohn said.
The fracture was the second medical problem the governor suffered in a
year. He spent several hours at a University of California, Davis,
hospital last December with a rapid heartbeat after coming down with a
stomach flu.
|
| Show full article (2.72Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Pedro SanchezPedro Sanchez
Date: Dec 23, 2006 21:12
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:24:08 -0800, 2968 Dead
finestplanet.com> wrote:
>>I love how the Liberals trot out the "Religion is a terrible
>>influence" and target it towards the Christian crowds. I wonder if
>>Liberals will ever dare admit that the problems we have with terrorism
>>is DIRECTLY related to the militant Islam? The Christian Bible makes
>>to mention of killing people who refuse to convert. However the Koran
>>makes mention of this often.
>
>I'm happy to admit that Islamic fundamentalism is a potential threat.
Glad to hear/see that said/written. However you'll pardon me being
surprised.
>The problems America faces with terrorism, however, are a direct
>result of America's rapacious and meddlesome policies in the middle
>east.
But again you use the "yeah but" position. I do believe America could
make it a goal to not step foot in another country for 100 years and
the Liberals would then say "Why weren't you watching these people?"
|
| Show full article (2.49Kb) |
|
3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jim AlderJim Alder
Date: Dec 23, 2006 21:00
> The agency is not gearing up for a draft, an agency
> official said Thursday. The test itself would not
> likely occur until 2009.
Why do Liberal idiots get an erection and/or drool at the
mention of the draft?
--
"As Americans, we must always remember that we all have a common
enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I
refer, of course, to the federal government." - Dave Barry
|
| |
|
8 Comments |
|
|
Author: Fred OinkaFred Oinka
Date: Dec 23, 2006 20:28
> Whenever I see one of these children with a Che article of clothing, I
> ask they the shirt comes in Hitler?
I'm in a hurry, please quit stalin.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ClaveClave
Date: Dec 23, 2006 20:21
>
> Clave wrote:
>>>
>>> 2942 Dead wrote:
>>>> On 17 Dec 2006 21:33:48 -0800, "Shrikeback" hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>Sounds like you're saying that when people talk shit you don't
>>>>>like, it's worse than murder. Well, if that's so, then what do you
>>>>>have against the death penalty. After all, murder ain't any worse
>>>>>than speech, and ususally people who are against the death
>>>>>penalty are against it because it's killing. But if murder ain't
>>>>>any worse than free speech, why is execution? So I'm guessin
>>>>>you call for the government to end free speech soon enough.
>>>>>It's a slippery slope frorm making them ban executions for ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
