Inexpensive Bar Coding Software
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.snailmail only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.snailmail Profile…
 Up
Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Mail Man Bob
Date: Jul 27, 2007 17:51

I'm looking for a low cost (nonprofit budge) package to take a list of 1500
names/addresses in CSV or other spreadsheet, sort by zip code, add +4 using
the address and print out the mailing labels with bar codes on 30-up Avery
labels.

I have seen anything from $19.95 to $300 for this and would appreciate any
help from someone who has used a decent package.

Thanks.

Bob
34 Comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Long Gone
Date: Jul 27, 2007 17:59

"Mail Man Bob" where.com> wrote in message
news:Mqwqi.638$FO1.51@trnddc05...
> I'm looking for a low cost (nonprofit budge) package to take a list of
1500
> names/addresses in CSV or other spreadsheet, sort by zip code, add +4
using
> the address and print out the mailing labels with bar codes on 30-up Avery
> labels.
>
> I have seen anything from $19.95 to $300 for this and would appreciate any
> help from someone who has used a decent package.

I am probably way off base on this, but, wouldn't mail merge using Word
accomplish this for you? I know Word can do labels and can do bar codes for
the address. Not sure if that would work or not.
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Guv Bob
Date: Jul 27, 2007 18:03

Ah so! What version of Word would that be? I'll check into it. Do you
know if it is accepted by the PO?
Show full article (0.90Kb)
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Long Gone
Date: Jul 27, 2007 20:23

"Guv Bob" bigfootYEEEEEEEOW.com> wrote in message
news:iBwqi.642$FO1.312@trnddc05...
> Ah so! What version of Word would that be? I'll check into it. Do you
> know if it is accepted by the PO?

Your masquerade perplexes me. Almost any version of Word does bar codes.
Yes, the PO accepts them.
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Rick Blaine
Date: Jul 27, 2007 20:54

"Long Gone" nospamforadam.com> wrote:
> I know Word can do labels and can do bar codes for
>the address.

Word 2007 no longer does bar codes. According to Microsoft, that feature was
removed at USPS request because the rules for generating the codes have changed
and supposedly only bulk mailers were supposed to be printing envelopes with the
code.

--
"Tell me what I should do, Annie."
"Stay. Here. Forever." - Life On Mars
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Rick Blaine
Date: Jul 27, 2007 21:00

"Long Gone" nospamforadam.com> wrote:
> Almost any version of Word does bar codes.

Except Word 2007 and (presumably) later...
>Yes, the PO accepts them.

Only from approved bulk mailers who do online address verification.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/897290

--
"Tell me what I should do, Annie."
"Stay. Here. Forever." - Life On Mars
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Adam H. Kerman
Date: Jul 27, 2007 21:31

Rick Blaine bother.com> wrote:
>"Long Gone" nospamforadam.com> wrote:
>>I know Word can do labels and can do bar codes for the address.
>Word 2007 no longer does bar codes. According to Microsoft, that feature
>was removed at USPS request because the rules for generating the codes
>have changed and supposedly only bulk mailers were supposed to be printing
>envelopes with the code.

I still use Word 2000. The barcode rules changed for encoding addresses
encoded as highrises, in theory, any street address with at least four
delivery points. These require that the secondary address (suite,
apartment, floor) be used. There's an algorythm for encoding the
secondary address. Why didn't Microsoft just build it into Word?

With my last mail merge, I added ZIP+4 codes to the mailing list with
CASS certified software and added a field for the numeric equivalent of the
bar code. I can't recall if I used 11 digits because I had to let Word
calculate the check digit or used all 12 digits. I put that field into a
Word field as input for the barcode generator and used Word to print the
barcodes on the mailpieces. It wasn't that difficult.
Show full article (1.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Adam H. Kerman
Date: Jul 27, 2007 21:40

Rick Blaine bother.com> wrote:
>"Long Gone" nospamforadam.com> wrote:
>>Almost any version of Word does bar codes.
>Except Word 2007 and (presumably) later...
>>Yes, the PO accepts them.
>Only from approved bulk mailers who do online address verification.

Cute. Microsoft refers you to Postal Explorer. There's no online
verification requirement. Some of the vendors provide online
verification, but off line is more typical.
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Rick Blaine
Date: Jul 27, 2007 21:48

"Adam H. Kerman" chinet.com> wrote:
>I still use Word 2000. The barcode rules changed for encoding addresses
>encoded as highrises, in theory, any street address with at least four
>delivery points. These require that the secondary address (suite,
>apartment, floor) be used. There's an algorythm for encoding the
>secondary address. Why didn't Microsoft just build it into Word?
>

Got me. I suspect it's because the USPS really doesn't want non-bulk mailers
printing barcodes. Or maybe the electronic postage mafia (PB, stamps.com, etc.)
put pressure on USPS. There's really no reason why you should have to pay
someone a subscription fee and override to print 1st class postage and postnet
codes on a PC. Other countries don't have any issues with it.
>
>There's no such standard that only bulk mailers are supposed to be
>printing barcoded envelopes. If you are capable of generating barcodes,
>then do so, regardless of whether the mailing qualifies for the
>discount. It saves steps at processing plants.
>

Perhaps. But according to Microsoft: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/897290
Show full article (2.12Kb)
no comments
Re: Inexpensive Bar Coding Software         


Author: Adam H. Kerman
Date: Jul 27, 2007 23:16

Rick Blaine bother.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" chinet.com> wrote:
>>I still use Word 2000. The barcode rules changed for encoding addresses
>>encoded as highrises, in theory, any street address with at least four
>>delivery points. These require that the secondary address (suite,
>>apartment, floor) be used. There's an algorithm for encoding the
>>secondary address. Why didn't Microsoft just build it into Word?
>Got me. I suspect it's because the USPS really doesn't want non-bulk mailers
>printing barcodes. Or maybe the electronic postage mafia (PB, stamps.com,
>etc.) put pressure on USPS. There's really no reason why you should have
>to pay someone a subscription fee and override to print 1st class postage
>and postnet codes on a PC. Other countries don't have any issues with it.

I wonder. Couldn't someone just add the barcode font? Previous versions of
Word treated it like a font, so I suppose that the current version could. The
little bit of Visual Basic code that produced barcodes in older versions
probably couldn't be hacked in easily, but I suppose it could be done as a
macro. Otherwise, if you know the numeric bar code, then just change fonts
on the envelope. Don't see why this wouldn't work.
Show full article (3.23Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4