>>>> One loud and particularly obnoxious newsloon has been harping for
>>>> years that the Game is Over. Actually it's never been better than
>>>> it is right now. Those of us that do go out know that the women
>>>> these days are considerably more knowledgeable about sex and have
>>>> more desire to play now than they did 30 years ago.

>>>
>>> And a far greater pool of men to choose from, since most men are
>>> eschewing marriage. Women wanting to have sex doesn't translate
>>> into their wanting to have it with every loser who read "The Game."
>>>

>> At last count they have sold about 170,000 copies of "The Game". The
>> amount of actual pickup instruction in that book is not great, it's
>> mostly a story about some dysfunctional people who lived together in
>> Hollywood, and their exploits. Most people have real jobs, unlike
>> you, and have to spend a large part of their time working.

>
> Last time I checked I work a real job. That I don't punch a time
> clock is a plus, not a minus.
>
> As for "The Game," the sales are more than 170,000, plus the book is
> given or loaned to people, so there is a multiplier there. Then there
> are the websites and other media exposure. The book is also still
> selling steadily, and as for pickup instruction, Mystery is releasing
> his VAH as a paperback soon.
>
>

>>>>Due to the internet, women have become more educated and liberated
>>>>about their choices for sexual gratification, and that has caused
>>>>them to be more curious, and considerably more daring than the women
>>>>of the 60s and 70s, which were supposed to be EVEN MORE LIBERATED
>>>>than their older siblings and parents.

>>>
>>> The STD risks say otherwise, though women definitely have more men
>>> to choose from now. Those tall/rich/jock types are no longer
>>> marrying in large numbers, so women can find them literally every
>>> weekend out in the nightlife now.
>>>

>> The STD risk is acually lower now as most people are using condoms.

>
> Condoms don't prevent herpes.
>

>>This was not true in the 80s and before. People still get married,
>>but nowdays they take more time and try and do it right the first
>>time.

>
> Marriage is down 40 percent from a generation ago.
>

>>Over half of marriages fail, and the reasons are the same as they have
>>always been, only now a divorce is MUCH easier to get, so there are a
>>lot more people in the dating pool with former spouses in their
>>background. Used goods? I'm glad you look at it that way, more for me
>>then.

>
> It's not about "used goods," but rather that sexual free agency has
> totally altered the dating market. There are far more hotties of both
> genders who are not married going out every weekend. This is
> competition that simply didn't exist forty or fifty years ago, because
> these folks used to marry off.
>
> Whereas forty years ago some nice guy might have been able to marry a
> 10, that same nice guy won't be able to take her home from a bar on
> Friday night, because the 10 is out there trying to get some
> investment-banker type to "commit" to her, because HE is at the bar as
> well, since he didn't marry off.
>
> While it may be profitable for the gurus to teach 100 men how to win
> at musical chairs, 99 of them are going to lose. Because the
> competition is tougher, the promise of winning will sell for a much
> higher price, with much less odds of occurring.
>
> Like in the gold rush, those who "mine the miners" are the ones who
> make out.
>
>

>>> Unless a man is blessed by being in the top 5-10 percent of men (by
>>> definition 90-95 percent of men are not), he'll get table scraps
>>> from the hottie sluts (like the guy who fucked one once, got hooked,
>>> and got dumped), but he won't reliably get them the way the
>>> super-alphas do.
>>>

>> The entire POINT of most of these books (except yours) is to teach me
>> how to BE one of the Alphs instead of one of the followers.

>
> That type of "alpha" becomes beta when that occurs, however, as there
> is simply not that much room at the top. PUA becomes, if not the new
> AFC, the new rAFC.
>
> If you double the rake in a poker game, there would still be winning
> players, but far fewer. Books on poker strategy would become basic
> knowledge rather than an advantage (and not worth what one charges for
> an edge), and so forth.
>
> Most men are not alpha, plain and simple, and most never will be. As
> more and more knowledge hits the masses, it becomes more and more
> difficult to stand out as an "alpha" except financially (which is an
> objective measure), or physically (which is a product of nature).
>
>

>>> This is a byproduct of sexual free agency, since attractive people
>>> no longer leave the dating market, and as a result, the rest of the
>>> crowd has to compete against them for far longer than before. That
>>> investment banker/ex-jock/scholar would have married 50 years ago;
>>> today he'll keep six hotties on a string and never commit.
>>>

>> Thank you, I do try hard to keep several hotties on the string.

>
> Prove it.
>

>>They also are social proof so I can get more.

>
> Pivots, what I wrote about years ago....
>
> Of course, there's a difference between actually getting these women
> and claiming that one gets them. Oh wait, this guy said he has MONEY
> (something about earning over a quarter-million). Yes, money will
> attract hot women.
>
> Since the average income in this country is closer to $30k, however,
> this does little to help the average man.
>
>

>>>> Education is always a good thing.

>>>
>>> Not when it educates the world on how to get an advantage previously
>>> reserved for only a few men.
>>>

>> As I said, 170,000 copies of last years book will not change the
>> world. You need to get outside more, it's a BIG WORLD.

>
> He said as he clicked "send...."
>

>>>You have a bad hand, and you don't know when to quit. Like your
>>>kooksoots, you can't recognize it when you are wrong and so you bore
>>>everyone with your loser mentality. You do understand that this
>>>entire screed is a loser mentality don't you? Chicken Little? The
>>>sky is only falling for you, everyone else is just fine.

>
> The only "loser mentality" is that held by men who continually try to
> play a game that is rigged against them unless they are tall and rich
> (this guy claims to be rich).
>
> A man who is not rich, not tall, and not exceptionally good-looking is
> an absolute fool if he thinks ASF methods will get him what he wants.
> Even Mystery talks about how he uses his money and fame to get women.
>
> Clubs even now have "bottle service" to separate rich and poor, and to
> drop the hotties into the laps of the rich. The price? $500 a night.
>

>> Keep fighting those windmills Sir Don, everyone else sees you are the
>> Court Jester. Amusing but not a role model...LOL

>
> Said the man who can't prove he's bedded even a single hottie.
>