|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Dec 17, 2007 23:42
On another board, she was stupid enough to quote the idiots from this group
about me. Thought it was REALLY funny.
To check to make sure the source was anonymous (for legal reasons), I
realized she had left her name out there for anyone to find.
For being stupid enough to listen to a bunch of "PUAs" that she otherwise
despises, just to win an internet flame war, she deserves to be outed. How
amusing that those who post about my personal shit on a much higher level
suddenly have a problem with their standards being applied to others.
The Stripaholic is also an example of how women have gotten to the point
where they actually think the sex industry gives them the same legitimacy as
a white-collar profession. It doesn't. My city barely tolerates strippers
or the sex industry, regulating them strongly, with good reason.
It'll be a defiinite lesson to the Stripaholic on why one shouldn't believe
everything one reads online, since she was more or less goaded into doing
so, though she was also too willing to believe what she read. She was more
or less set up by the liars on this group.
Then again, if she wanted to stay anonymous, she could have. Nothing I know
about her is anything that was not learned from her online presence. As the
"free speech" advocates here point out, that's fair game.
|
| Show full article (2.02Kb) |
|
| | 41 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ZFORCEZFORCE Date: Dec 18, 2007 00:50
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
Stalk much k00k?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: ZFORCEZFORCE Date: Dec 18, 2007 01:27
"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:adKdnWzaWLQ8DPranZ2dnUVZ_sGvnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
> cybersheet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> Stalk much k00k?
>
> How amusing that those who made the arguments FOR publishing stuff like
> that would be against it.
>
When you find her, you going to wish "Death" on her children?
or "root" for cancer?
Since the GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENius says it's legal to "out" people,
I might have to send a copy of your post to your elderly Mother, maybe SHE
can deal with you.
> Cite the law I'd be violating. Please.
>
Pffft, the she-man is such a legal GEEEEEEEEEENius she can't find it
herself.
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: AlexAlex Date: Dec 18, 2007 05:07
in article lKKdner1odhm5PranZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@ pghconnect.com, Ray Gordon,
creator of the "pivot" at ray@ cybersheet.com wrote on 12/18/07 2:42 AM:
> On another board, she was stupid enough to quote the idiots from this group
> about me. Thought it was REALLY funny.
>
> To check to make sure the source was anonymous (for legal reasons), I
> realized...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Dec 18, 2007 07:52
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:lKKdner1odhm5PranZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@pghconnect.com:
> On another board, she was stupid enough to quote the idiots from this
> group about me. Thought it was REALLY funny.
>
> To check to make sure the source was anonymous (for legal reasons), I
> realized...
|
| Show full article (2.30Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Dec 18, 2007 07:55
gordy roy parker, creator of molehills that he claims are mountains,
whined:
> cybersheet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> Stalk much k00k?
>
> How amusing that those who made the arguments FOR publishing stuff
> like that would be against it.
>
> Cite the law I'd be violating. Please.
>
and once again where is anyone here against it? I haven't seen anyone
saying you should not do it, I've just seen people telling you that you
are acting like a stalker.
--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Dec 18, 2007 09:34
>And once again gordy roy parker goes into his "I know who you really
>are" spew. And once again no sane person believes what he posts unless he
>provides verifiable evidence of his claims.
Does grp-ie really think anyone who goes into a strip joint cares
if others see them..? Unless they are hiding from the wife, or
going into some 'off' joint where they SHOULD be ashamed to be,
who the fuck cares? When I did DJ work at s/joints, I seldom
if ever saw someone come in who was afraid someone would see them.
Even when I was 15, doing KBoard work in the Boston 'Combat Zone'
(well before the days of tape or disks) and well know people came
in, they could care less if others saw them. Today, if some idiot
'public figure' comes in, and has to worry if others see this 'icon'
doing wrong (in their eyes) then said P/Figure is a complete wanker.
>gordy roy, you are NOT 'outing' someone.
Parker's whole life has been trying to prove someone elses is 'bad'
and the world needs to know about it. Trouble is, he ends up just
showing the world what a child molesting hate monging faggot he is.
|
| Show full article (4.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Dec 18, 2007 10:32
> Hmmm.... Outing someone on a public newsgroup because she pissed him off
> by
> laughing at him?
>
> Somewhere, Tommy Boy must be laughing.
>
> That's now TWO people's information he's threatened to make public.
The reason the Stripaholic's name will be made public is that she was STUPID
enough to believe the crap she read that originated from some people in this
group, and thought it was amusing to repeat it.
To show how stupid the people in this group are, and to prove how stupid it
is to listen to them, I'll go ahead and out her, and Alex can see how it's
perfectly legal to do so, since she more or less outed herself. The only
reason I pcked up on that, however, was that she repeated the shit from
here. Once I figured out who she was, she didn't seem too eager to get
personal with my info.
When her name gets published -- and it will, as part of an article I'm
doing -- she will have only herself, and her "PUA internet friends" to
blame. There also won't be a damn thing she can do about it.
|
| Show full article (1.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Date: Dec 18, 2007 11:29
>The reason the Stripaholic's name will be made public is that she was STUPID
>enough to believe the crap she read that originated from some people in this
>group, and thought it was amusing to repeat it.
hehehe..wait, some slag is stupid enough to act apon what (U claim) she
read on this newsgroup, and she repeated it for some stupid reason, and
NOW..for this 'crime', you will 'out' her for some idiotic reason?
Triple ya meds, Parker. You need help. Want some booze to down them with?
>To show how stupid the people in this group are, and to prove how stupid it
>is to listen to them, I'll go ahead and out her, and Alex can see how it's
>perfectly legal to do so, since she more or less outed herself. The only
>reason I pcked up on that, however, was that she repeated the shit from
>here. Once I figured out who she was, she didn't seem too eager to get
>personal with my info.
???????????????? Forget the above statement I made, seek medical help
right away. Do you really think any of that makes sense other then 'rayality'.
>When her name gets published -- and it will, as part of an article I'm
>doing -- she will have only herself, and her "PUA internet friends" to
>blame. There also won't be a damn thing she can do about it.
And who made you judge n jury to do this? HOW does it effect you?
|
| Show full article (4.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|