> "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's
> Loathsome Agendas!" mchsi.com> wrote:

>> Uncle Vic withheld.com> wrote:

>>> "good@rock.com" rock.com> wrote:

>>>> Clothing optional beaches are better because you can go skinny
>>>> dipping and not get tan lines.

>>> You also don't have to walk around in a dripping pair of trunks.
>>> You also don't have to worry about jellyfish swimming up your
>>> trunks. You also don't get grating sand in your crotch.
>>> You also get to take girl-watching to a whole new level.

>>>> These two reasons make clothing optional beaches infinitely
>>>> better. Skinny dipping is way better than wearing a swimsuit and
>>>> you look way better without tan lines. You have an unalienable
>>>> right to choose to wear what you want to wear and this includes
>>>> wearing nothing.

>>> I wish that were true. But keep this in mind. There are no
>>> federal laws
>>> (in the USA) concerning public nudity. Seek out federal land, post a
>>> warning sign, and you're completely within your rights, as long as
>>> you are 500 yards from any public thoroghfare (road, sidewalk, etc.),
>>> or not along the sightline of a casual glance.

>> Good info!!!

> That's what keeps Deep Creek Hot Springs legal. It's on federal land,
> and very remote. It's also adjacent to a private ranch, the owner of
> which has allowed the passage through his property to the trailhead for a
> small fee, and is unopposed to nudity. You can leave your clothes in the
> trunk of your car and hike there nude, although the trail drops about 750
> feet in about 3/4 of a mile. It's a killer climb out.