| Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas! Date: Sep 17, 2008 22:51
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:04:54 -0400,
John Baker bizniz.net> wrote:
> "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's
> Loathsome Agendas!"mchsi.com> wrote:
>>> Clothing optional beaches are better because you can go skinny
>>> dipping and not get tan lines. These two reasons make clothing
>>> optional beaches infinitely better. Skinny dipping is way better
>>> than wearing a swimsuit and you look way better without tan lines.
>> Not to mention the girls' looking 'way better without swimsuits!
> Well .... *some* of them do..
Good point!
>>> You have an unalienable right to choose to wear what you want
>>> to wear and this includes wearing nothing.
>>>
>>> Given that people are highly likely to want to wear nothing at a beach
>>> or anytime when swimming, and based on this right to choose to wear
>>> whatever you want to wear, we should have more clothing optional
>>> beaches and swimming areas everywhere in the world.
>>>
>>> Going naked is also not a gay thing. You may see a naked man at a
>>> nude beach, but he's more likely heterosexual than homosexual.
>> I can vouch for that! I met one of my favorite girlfriends at
>> Black's Beach in La Jolla, California!
|