Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better         

Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!
Date: Sep 17, 2008 22:51

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:04:54 -0400,
John Baker bizniz.net> wrote:
> "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's
> Loathsome Agendas!"mchsi.com> wrote:
>> "good@rock.com" rock.com> wrote:
>>> Clothing optional beaches are better because you can go skinny
>>> dipping and not get tan lines. These two reasons make clothing
>>> optional beaches infinitely better. Skinny dipping is way better
>>> than wearing a swimsuit and you look way better without tan lines.
>> Not to mention the girls' looking 'way better without swimsuits!
> Well .... *some* of them do..

Good point!
>>> You have an unalienable right to choose to wear what you want
>>> to wear and this includes wearing nothing.
>>>
>>> Given that people are highly likely to want to wear nothing at a beach
>>> or anytime when swimming, and based on this right to choose to wear
>>> whatever you want to wear, we should have more clothing optional
>>> beaches and swimming areas everywhere in the world.
>>>
>>> Going naked is also not a gay thing. You may see a naked man at a
>>> nude beach, but he's more likely heterosexual than homosexual.
>> I can vouch for that! I met one of my favorite girlfriends at
>> Black's Beach in La Jolla, California!

-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)

xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!