Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better         

Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: Uncle Vic
Date: Sep 17, 2008 22:10

One fine day in alt.atheism, "good@rock.com" rock.com> wrote:

Interesting troll, but you're absolutely right.
> Clothing optional beaches are better because you can go skinny dipping
> and not get tan lines.

You also don't have to walk around in a dripping pair of trunks.
You also don't have to worry about jellyfish swimming up your trunks.
You also don't get grating sand in your crotch.
You also get to take girl-watching to a whole new level.
> These two reasons make clothing optional
> beaches infinitely better. Skinny dipping is way better than wearing
> a swimsuit and you look way better without tan lines. You have an
> unalienable right to choose to wear what you want to wear and this
> includes wearing nothing.

I wish that were true. But keep this in mind. There are no federal laws
(in the USA) concerning public nudity. Seek out federal land, post a
warning sign, and you're completely within your rights, as long as you
are 500 yards from any public thoroghfare (road, sidewalk, etc.), or not
along the sightline of a casual glance.
>
> Given that people are highly likely to want to wear nothing at a beach
> or anytime when swimming,

Well, those people number about 2%% of the population of the world, last I
heard. Nude resorts in the Caribbean and Mexico are on the rise,
however. But most people in today's society have been taught by parents
and religious leaders to be ashamed of their bodies. Imagine that...
> and based on this right to choose to wear
> whatever you want to wear, we should have more clothing optional
> beaches and swimming areas everywhere in the world.

There are many other possibilities!

How about:

Clothing-optional shopping.
Clothing-optional golf.
Clothing-optional barbeques.
Clothing-optional church.
>
> Going naked is also not a gay thing. You may see a naked man at a
> nude beach, but he's more likely heterosexual than homosexual.
>

And if he's homosexual, he's still accepted societally, since sexuality
and nudism are completely separate issues - something your average Joe
(or Josephine) doesn't understand.

Another nice plus is that the usual human generalizing classification by
income, career, etc., disappears completely in a nudist environment.
Everyone suddenly looks the same! It's a really cool social experience.

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Separator of Church and Reason.
Convicted by Earthquack.
1 Comment
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!