Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Why Clothing Optional Beaches Are Better         

Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: John Baker
Date: Sep 17, 2008 22:04

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:14:06 GMT, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO
FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!"
mchsi.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:19:31 -0700 (PDT),
>"good@rock.com" rock.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Clothing optional beaches are better because you can go skinny
>> dipping and not get tan lines. These two reasons make clothing
>> optional beaches infinitely better. Skinny dipping is way better
>> than wearing a swimsuit and you look way better without tan lines.
>
> Not to mention the girls' looking 'way better without swimsuits!

Well .... *some* of them do..
>
>> You have an unalienable right to choose to wear what you want
>> to wear and this includes wearing nothing.
>>
>> Given that people are highly likely to want to wear nothing at a beach
>> or anytime when swimming, and based on this right to choose to wear
>> whatever you want to wear, we should have more clothing optional
>> beaches and swimming areas everywhere in the world.
>>
>> Going naked is also not a gay thing. You may see a naked man at a
>> nude beach, but he's more likely heterosexual than homosexual.
>
> I can vouch for that! I met one of my favorite girlfriends at
>Black's Beach in La Jolla, California!
>
>
> -- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)
>
> xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
> http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
> http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
> http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!