On Jul 9, 10:07 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Gordon, you are an interesting object. I'm flirting with the idea,
not too seriously, but it's something I might do, of compliling some
of your more illustrative posts and legal pleadings to have an ex
associate look them over. It would be intersting to see what her take
on you is. Like I said, a self documenting case study. Fabulous!

I was wondering, reading this latest burst of vitriol from you, if you
were shaken as a child. Maybe your mother or a 'boy friend' shook you
as a form of discipline? It wouldn't have to be too hard, not enough
to cause them to take you to a hospital, or cause the retinal tell
tails which would show up on a physical. Perhaps you felt drowsy
afterwards, or maybe nauseas, or maybe both? Shaking would slam the
front and the rear of the brain into the skull. Overtime, with
repetition, that would lead to permanent deficits. Repeated sub
critical trauma, not requiring care, but accumulating. The deficits
may not show up until around 12 - 14 when the expected development in
areas like moral judgment and empathy would be capped and become age
innappropriate because no further development would occur.

Of course, I'm not saying that any of this happened and that around
the age of 12 = 14 you started having problems which increased as you
grew older and more mature behavior and thinking was expected. I was
just wondering.

The moral reasoning and behavior of certain types of brain damage is
an interesting subject. The normal negative emotional response to the
idea of doing something that the damaged person knows is immoral is
missing. They know it's immoral, but there is no internal check on
their behvior. When they behave immorally, it's out of fear of being
found out and suffering punishment. That's the moral reasoning of a
12 year old.

Wasn't it you that said "If it was legal, I'd ...?" I'm sure it was.
In fact, it seems that everything you do is in arenas where there is
no consequence that you recognize as meaningful. Will losing your
internet access and the automatic criminal violation that would occur
if you are ever found on the net again be meaningful? Who knows?
Maybe you could sustain your 'I'm a fem' delusion and the jail time
would seem like paradise as the tank bitch.

Vance