| . . . while it is not entirely clear from Plaintiff’s rambling Complaint . . . |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: HCHC Date: Jul 27, 2008 19:26
In addition, while it is not entirely clear from Plaintiff’s rambling
Complaint, should Parker be claiming direct copyright infringement
based on Google’s automatic caching of web pages as a means of
indexing websites and producing results to search queries, this
activity does not constitute direct infringement either. Based upon
Title II of the DMCA, … 17 USC Section 512(b), the District Court for
the District of Nevada recently held that Google is entitled to the
Act’s safe harbor provisions for its system caching activities.
Field, 2006 WL 242465 at *14-16 (granting Google’s motion for summary
judgment that it qualifies for Section 512(b) safe harbor for system
caching.) We conclude that Plaintiff has not stated a claim upon
which relief can be granted based solely on Google’s automatic system
caching.
|