Here's what gordo has previously stated regarding what constitutes
harassment or threats.....
_____________________________________________________
From: notraymondx@juno.com (Ray G Smith)
Subject: Re: Ray Gordon Abusive Posting
Date: 1998/06/12

<--------Stalking refers to attempts to contact or harass people, and it
must involve threats to their safety. Existing stalking laws can also be
applied to online and have been. But keep in mind that anyone can block
e-mail and instant messages, and that they do not have to read USENET. Libel
even is not stalking, if it were even libel, which it is not.

<-----------Be specific as to which threats. USENET is archived. Go ahead,
try to find a threat, please. According to the FBI, a threat has to be a
specific statement of intent to commit a specific harm against a specific
individual. WORDING IS VERY IMPORTANT. You also might want to check out
the many death threats posted against me while you are at it. You are trying
to argue a legal case in an unmoderated environment as well, a case where
you are not even directly involved and in which your level of
self-involvement with would disqualify you from sitting on any jury.

As the previous poster is in DENIAL about his conduct (the psychs talk about
that too), he would claim that discovery or trial isn't necessary.

Recently, the previous poster accused me of running some type of employment
scam, claiming that I had responded to a woman who responded to my ad on
sexyjobs.com. When he uncovers the level of refutation I have against his
claim, he won't have a leg to stand on, and he'll be proven to be defaming
me.

That's *one* incident of hundreds or thousands over the past several years
in this group. A group of individuals wants the public to give it
credibility, yet also wants to avoid all scrutiny and legal accountability.
They threatened my mother while she was dying, and after she died, continued
their lives about my living situation. Once refuted again, even though they
could have checked PACER for proo of my mom's death the day after she died,
they act as if they never told those lies in the first place.

It is pointless to try to argue repeatedly against a group of individuals
who split their attacks so it so as not to draw too much attention to any
one of them, while attempting to build a "mutual credibility society."

On 8/1/08 11:57 PM, in article
2-qdnYtfZ_2ORg7VnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@pghconnect.com, "Ray Gordon, creator of
absolutely nothing" cybersheet.com> wrote:

And when the judge tells you that that is NOT the purpose of discovery?

When the judge tells you that you need to have some evidence to get to
discovery? Things like names, dates, places, amounts of money.... Any of
this ringing a bell?

It should, it's been the basis for every one of your 21 dismissals so far.

What do they say about people who do the same thing over and over and yet
expect different results?

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:2-qdnYtfZ_2ORg7VnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@pghconnect.com...

They psychs you've ducked, and never gone to see?

That's odd, someone filing k00ks00ts as "in forma pauperis" has enough money
to pay a model found on sexyjobs.com? It's not a big leap to show your
motives here. All people have to do is read your google archives. Oh wait,
you were being impersonated weren't you. Yet you won't tell me how a poster
can positivly identify Gordon Roy Parker as the author of a post. CHICKEN.

"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:2-qdnYtfZ_2ORg7VnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@pghconnect.com:

First of all, gordy roy legal buffoon, there is no 'group of
individuals' in this newsgroup, there are a bunch of posters. I have not
seen one of these individual posters say they want 'the public to give'
him/her 'credibility'.
The only comments I have seen about credibility is people giving their
opinions that you totally lack credibility. That is a far cry from want
the public to give them credibility.

you have been asked a few times by one poster to tell him what he has
posted that you find harassing and defamatory and he will stop posting
those things. you refuse to do this. Kinda blows any standing you might
have right there.

In article <2-qdnYtfZ_2ORg7VnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@pghconnect.com>
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
aka Gordon Roy Parker

More projection, so typical of NPD.

On Aug 1, 11:57�pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

Even if you prove he's wrong about his statement, it *still* wouldn't
amount to defamation.

1/ You'd have to show that your 100%% self destroyed reputation was
FURTHER hurt. 110%%, Ray Ray?

2/ What are your MONETARY DAMAGES?

Did you enjoy your Friday night? Wake up next to a hottie, Ray Ray?
And I don't mean the hot water bag you fell aslee with on your head.

In article <2-qdnYtfZ_2ORg7VnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@pghconnect.com>,
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:

So you *do* have enough money to pay Thom what the courts ordered you
to pay.

but has any of those hundreds or thousands (You don't know? you should
keep better records and a better count if you're trying to convict
someone of a pattern of wrongdoing. Otherwise people might think you're
just going on a fishing expedition.) incidents resulted in a
conviction, or even an arrest?

On Aug 1, 11:57�pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

LOL!

Gordon Raytardo channeling Ricky Ricardo!

Loosie, I don thin the Mertzes are coming over tonight.

LOL!

On 8/2/08 11:10 AM, in article
8cab4f95-0036-4151-9c6f-0120169fe2db@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, "HC"
aol.com> wrote:

Ricky Retardo.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **