On May 14, 1:23Â pm, HC
aol.com> wrote:> On May 14, 3:56�pm, Vance
gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On May 14, 9:05�am, HellBwat
yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> First, the offer of the 20 g's is a valid contract. It is written,
>>> there fore ease to prove in a court of law. If you can prove Tom is
>>> using my name to post under.
>
>> You are wrong. �There are necessary conditions that have to all be met
>> and only if they are met will there be sufficient support at law for
>> there to be a contract. �Given the context of the offer and the nature
>> of any acceptance, you just might have a wager - the obligations of
>> which, according to my limited understanding, can't be enforced at law
>> by either (or any)party.
>
>> There might be someone following this folly with the knowledge to
>> explain where I am substantially wrong about this situation.
>
>>> Second, this right here is slander, accusing Tom of creating a sock
>>> puppet and unethical methods to promote a product, if you had any
>>> money, I am pretty sure he could sue the shit out of you. hmm, that
>>> would be so funny to see, the look on your stupid face when they call
>>> me to the stand, knowing then how really fucked you are.
>
>> You already say I am to wordy, so I'll shorten this to: Don't be too
>> sure. �The last freakin thing I would do is use the word 'and' in
>> formulating the basis of a lawsuit. �There are several of the 'moron
>> crew' who I'm pretty sure could explain why this could create really
>> big problems.
>
>>> Fourth, since Tom was never in the Nam, he couldn't tell you many of
>>> the slang words we used, like, oh and your sister knows this one well,
>>> fuckee suckee ten dolla. Oh me so horny, me love you long time.
>
> Wow, I can't believe what I'm reading. Thanks Vance, I plow right
> through Vizzini's "Tim" posts and rarely ever read them all the way
> through, so if not for you quoting it, I wouldn't have ever been able
> to laugh at it!
>
> So Vizzini thinks that knowing phrases like ". . . me so horny, me
> love you long time . . ." indicates some kind of evidence that he
> served in Vietnam . . . pretty funny, anybody that's ever seen "Full
> Metal Jacket" knows the phrase. In fact, it's arguably one of the top
> ten best known movie lines of all time.
No doubt. And "fuckee suckee five buckee" was from "American Gigolo",
I think. This is hillarious - catching vizzinni's sock puppet in his
own set of lies and lame, transparent attempts at covering his
tracks... LOL.
>
>> I ran your comments contained here and some other comments you have
>> made past some Nam Vets at 'Swords into Plowshares'. �I can sum up
>> their virtually universal opinion regarding the results of their sniff
>> test most politely as 'Something smells offensive.' �If you don't like
>> their opinion, take it up with them. �I feel fairly sure they would be
>> happy to discuss any issues you have with them by e-mail. �They are
>> very direct and very fair. �They also expressed the opinion that they
>> could be wrong and only a closer sniff would be able to tell. �Contact
>> me personally and I will see about making arrangements. �My opinion I
>> will keep to myself.
>
>>>> Not to mention that a LOT of guys in vizzinni's age bracket fabricate
>>>> duty in "'nam."
>
>> This phenomenon has been noted in the psych literature. �I have
>> personally known people claiming to be vets that would have been, like
>> Tom would have been, between 14 to 16 at that time. �It's interesting
>> psychologically and also a sad little comment on their lives.
>
>> Vance
