On May 5, 1:38 pm, Nostromo wrote:
> Day 6: Court is now in session.
This is hilarious. You don't mind if I snip a lot of this supposed
bullshit away do you dickhead?
>
Yeah with what, more bullshit and the nose growing thing?
>
> The Court has made it clear that the Prosecution is not sufficiently
> proving its case. I will do my best to rectify that this week.
Maybe because neither of us care, no of course you didn't think of
that because your a moron.
Taunts and insults are fun when it is aimed at you retards. Sort of
like shooting fish in a barrel.
>
> Mr. Vizzini and Mr. Hellbwat have expressed this opinion as well. But
> they have not submitted any substantial evidence in their favour, and
> choose instead to mock this proceeding with taunts and insults.
>
snip.
So? Sometimes we come on at the same time and other times we come on
at very different times, that is proof of nothing but delusion in your
moronic mind.
> This past Saturday morning Mr. Hellbwat and Mr. Vizzini both showed up
> in this Court. They came in less than 30 minutes apart, sporting
> different styles, different points of view, and with Mr. Hellbwat
> addressing Mr. Vizzini directly. Just the sort of thing you would
> expect to see when dealing with two different people.
>
> And how very serendipitous that this should happen at this time, in
> this very thread. But surely, this kind of thing must happen all of
> the time, wouldn’t you think?
Blah blah blah conjection, blah blah blah conspiracy, blah blah blah,
can you prove any of it? Present some facts.
>
> Unfortunately this is exactly the kind of thing that does NOT happen
> all of the time. In fact, this kind of occurrence is extremely rare,
> despite the many opportunities the thousands of posts make possible.
>
You are such a dumbass, I refer to Tom in what ever the context calls
for.
>
> a) It is extremely rare for UnKaH to refer to “Tom” in anything other
> than the third person.
So what is your point, he doesn't refer to me as UnKaH because he
refers to me as Tim you dumbass, why because maybe he doesn't want to
call me UnKaH because that is supposed to be Uncle, and there is a
story behind it as too why he doesn't want to call me UnKaH.
>
> b) It is extremely rare for Mr. Vizzini to refer to UnKaH at all.
Maybe because we talk on the phone or visit each other so there is no
need to come on here an communicate, you dumbass.
>
> c) It is extremely rare for either of them to communicate with the
> other in their posts.
Actually the patterns emerge in your head, because you want them too.
>
> Curious, no? Thousands and thousands of posts. Hundreds of threads.
> And these patterns consistently emerge. Over and over and over
> again.
I dunno are they? Are you a handwriting expert? A psychologist? So you
can define those patterns, what is your field of expertise in that
area?
>
> Are these the expected interactions between two people who claim to be
> close friends, who talk offline to one another, and who spend personal
> time together?
Actually that is not true, I live an hour and ten minutes away, but I
guess it said about so it makes it right huh?
>
> Feb/06, Tom: “Unka… lives about an hour away from me and has been to
> several of our seminars.”
>
Again dumbass it is all context related.
> a) It is extremely rare for UnKaH to refer to “Tom” in anything other
> than the third person.
You don't have to do any search, I willingly admit I know Tom and he
knows me.
See here is what you don't know, Tom's studies of the brain took him
into the chemistry of the brain, what happens when things shift what
types of chemicals are invovled, dopamine or seratonin.
Where as I studied the brain in the parts of the brain such as
locations of memories, what happens when thoughts happen, what parts
of the brain are involved. But to explain it either way you still end
up with the same conclusion.
And that conclusion when it comes too you, your a fucking moron.
>
> One thing is for sure: UnKaH knows Mr. Vizzini. Click on UnKaH’s
> profile and pick out any month in his history. Perform a search on
> ‘Tom’. In addition to unbridled hostility, what you find is ‘Tom does
> this, Tom thinks that, Tom’s proven this, Tom’s not a liar’.
snip..too retarded to even give that a comment.
I am not expressing Tom's thoughts but my own, if they are alike, well
so be it, the moron crews thoughts are pretty singular, but then what
can you expect from a bunch of retards trying to play with the adults?
>
> Yes, UnKaH knows ‘Tom’. But how is it that UnKaH is so well-versed in
> the subject of ‘Tom’? How does he know Mr. Vizzini’s innermost
> thoughts, yet does not actually interact with him through his posts?
Well that is a guess but probably a good guess since he told me over
the phone he is not going to respond to them, meaning you and the
moron crew any more.
>
> UnkaH explains it himself when he tells us that “Tom does not respond
> to the... dee dee dee's”. But UnKaH sure does. Mr. Vizzini and UnKaH
> are each a face on a two-headed coin. The ‘Heads’ get Mr. Vizzini,
> and the ‘Tails’ (the Asses) are dealt with by UnKaH.
>
Case already refuted, moving on.
> b) It is extremely rare for Mr. Vizzini to refer to UnKaH at all.
>
> You don’t have to read too far to see that Mr. Vizzini stays clean by
> washing his hands of UnKaH. UnKaH is rarely spoken to, mentioned, or
> even acknowledged.
I have told him on several different occasions that if my antic's were
hurting his business I would stop. His actual words were, flame wars
actually increase sales, to which I thought was pretty funny since you
morons are actually helping Tom rather than hurting him and this has
been told too you and the moron crew more than once but yet in
disbelief, you continue....*L*
>
> Much like a government dealing with its spies or assassins, Mr.
> Vizzini gives UnKaH and his antics a wide berth. And when cornered on
> the subject, Mr. Vizzini claims that he doesn’t have control over
> anyone other than Mr. Vizzini:
I am not his puppet, am I master? ( for all the dee dee dee's it's
call sarcastic humor )
>
> Jan/08 “Let me say this. I don't control Tim.”
>
> Ah, yes. “He’s someone else! I can’t control him! Everything he
> does is to my advantage, but that’s got nothing to do with me!”
blah blah blah more conjecture and implication seriously lacking any
fact.
>
> How very convenient.
>
S what.
> c) It is extremely rare for either of them to communicate with the
> other in their posts.
Already refuted douche bag, moving on.
> So rare in fact, it is hard to find any examples. Why would this be
> if they were two different people?
So what? Now if that was me, Unkah talking to Vinnie and telling Tom
who he was, that would pretty much blow your case wide open, now
doesn't it. That was five years ago and you just made our case thank
you, I knew you were a dumb shit.
>
> Here’s a rare one from UnKaH, from Ap/03:
> (Addressing ‘Hitman’) “Hey ya, ya ol Mobster...How the hell have ya
> been, long time no see… Hey Tom this is Vinnie, originally from NY. He
> came to the same seminar I first attended.”
>
> and Mr. Vizzini posts: “ - ”
> and ‘Hitman’ posts: “ - ”
Seems forced, to you but then, could you tell where the inflections
were? What emotions were in the context of the sentence, you seem to
gather all that information off of words. Wow, your a great mind
reader.
>
> Seems forced and disingenuous.
>
Well stupid let me clear this up for you, a long time ago my name Tim
Slabiak was in front of my e-mail address, and I have had a lot of
different e-mail addresses, but the name pretty much remained the
same, except I used at one time monsterbaby instead of monsterbrat,
even though my handles have changed quite often. Do a search on that.
> Let me address one interesting exception to (b) above, where Mr.
> Vizzini does refer to “UnKa”. This is going to highlight an important
> piece in this puzzle, namely the existence of Tim S.
>
> I have met both Tim S. and Mr. Vizzini and can personally testify that
> they are two different people. My personal testimony is not proof,
> but there is no one here disputing this fact in any case.
Yes I am, I am one and the same, you can fly down to Atlanta come to
my house and I can show your stupid ass, on my computer I am the one
posting. Unless you can prove other wise, shut the fuck up, or maybe
do some I.P checking, I can also show you the scars I got when in Nam
and the paper work, where I was at in the hospital and my unit in Nam.
>
> The point to understand here is that Tim S. is NOT the poster known as
> UnKaH.
Wrong it is me having fun at your expense you stupid fuck.
It is Mr. Vizzini, when he cannot contain his bile, who posts
> as UnKaH.
>
> Consider the following:
True
I posted that to the list of essential skills and he asked if he could
use it as a testimony, I said yes, now your trying to make a federal
case of it, if you go to the essential skills list and read my post it
is word for word of the one Tom posted because he copied and pasted
it. More verifiable proof that your making all this shit up.
>
> Mr. Vizzini posts the following testimonial from Timmy:
>
Snip
Thanks, it is coming along real well now, 3D Mind is a great tool for
cleaning out the emotional garbage.
>
> Well, how very sweet for Timmy. We wish you all the best with your
> bright future.
Of course not, as you change, things change with it.
>
> Question: Does Timmy sound in any way, shape, or form like our old
> friend UnKaH?
Sorry dude, you are full of shit, I am one and the same person. Of
course Odorus, you can just ask ross and he will tell you who the real
UnKaH is.
>
> This Timmy is NOT the poster we have come to know as and love as UnKaH.
>
> ---
It was me, notice the e-mail address and the name, stupid.
>
>
> actually being posted by Timmy, or if Mr.Vizzini is simply relaying
> Timmy’s story at this point. In any case, it is not pertinent.>
Of course he is, he is part of the moron crew but I haven't seen him
here lately, I hope he didn't take to much dick and got choked or
something.
>
> This prompts Duck to quip:
> “You are such a bullshitter, the closest you have been to Vietnam is a
> chinese takeaway.”
>
> Let’s just say it goes downhill from there. Back and forth, flame vs.
> flame. But an interesting thing happens. Mr. Vizzini, who is
> supposed to be in England with more important things to do, is
> prompted to come to “Unka’s” defence:
>
> “Listen you gutless cowards. Unka went to war. He watched guys next
> to him vaporized by landmines... You are all nothing but pathetic
> cowards. You will never measure up to half the man that Unka is…”
Sure they are, have you ever thought that maybe he was having a bad
day and was tired of you silly fuckers trying to hurt his friend? Of
course you didn't, all you see is black and white, which is why your
such a fucking moron.
>
> Strong words indeed.
>
> But it raises the question, why would Mr. Vizzini come to “Unka’s”
> defense here, and never anywhere else? And who exactly is being
> defended?
*LOL* More conjecture, can you prove that? Of course you can't.
>
> Is it clearly Timmy’s story which is being told by "Unka" that now Mr.
> Vizzini steps in to defend.
He doesn't need to rise to defend my reputation, as UnKaH or Timmy
because I really don't give a fuck what you rat bastards say about me,
my rep is shit, damaged beyond repair, or as they say FUBAR.
>
> Whether posted by Unka or UnKaH, do not be confused. Mr. Vizzini only
> rises to protect his friend Timmy, and Timmy’s reputation.
Because I don't care, Tom often refers to me as bullet proof. I don't
care what you say about me, nothing you can say or do can hurt me
because well you are all to stupid to give any kind of credibility to,
and all words coming across the screen I have to give them meaning,
why do you think I gave you ammo to use against me, high school drop
out and dope addict, because you morons tried to use it and failed so
miserably. You just don't get it, YOU CANNOT hurt me, in any ways,
shape or form. Did you get yet?
Flames
> against UnKaH go unnoticed and are ignored.
More blah blah blah and conjecture and bullshit.
>
> For now, let the record show that:
> 6) Mr. Vizzini and UnKaH do not interact like two different people.
Tomorrow more conjected bullshit of the retard kind.
UnKaH
>
> Tomorrow: Do Mr. Vizzini and UnKaH post like two different people?
>
> Court is adjourned.
