"Al Greynolds" <awgreynolds@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:1191520562.293518.80490@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com... One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array which causes the application to run of stack or memory. I tracked it down to code that looks like this: subroutine f(n,c,m) parameter...

Al Greynolds wrote: One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array which causes the application to run of stack or memory. I tracked it down to code that looks like this: (snip) c=c*a !this is where the temporary is created Is there a valid reason for the one compiler to create this ...

Al Greynolds wrote: On Oct 4, 10:56 am, Al Greynolds <awgreyno...@earthlink.net> wrote: One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array which causes the application to run of stack or memory. ... Others have noted possible explanation for the "why", I'd simply ask if you've ensured that this compiler is ...

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: Al Greynolds wrote: One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array... Is there a valid reason for the one compiler to create this temporary? If so, why don't the others? It seems that in general compilers don't optimize array operations ...

On Oct 4, 10:56 am, Al Greynolds <awgreyno...@earthlink.net> wrote: One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array which causes the application to run of stack or memory. I tracked it down to code that looks like this: subroutine f(n,c,m) parameter (KR=8) intent(in) n,m complex(KR),intent(...

One of the 4 Fortran-95 compilers I use with my application appears to create an unnecessary temporary intermediate array which causes the application to run of stack or memory. I tracked it down to code that looks like this: subroutine f(n,c,m) parameter (KR=8) intent(in) n,m complex(KR),intent(in) :: c(n,abs(m)) !can be up to 1GB real(KR) a : if (m>0) return a...

...a pilot current, but not necessarily proficient. Let's agree to disagree Stealthy and leave it at that. such patronising comments do not make a discussion.(which btw was on unnecessary costs in aviation) the real problem out there is that you people strive for absolute perfection in a process that can never approach perfection. no process can but you'll kill it ...

... a pilot current, but not necessarily proficient. Let's agree to disagree Stealthy and leave it at that. such patronising comments do not make a discussion.(which btw was on unnecessary costs in aviation) the real problem out there is that you people strive for absolute perfection in a process that can never approach perfection. no process can but you'll kill it trying. ...

... keep a pilot current, but not necessarily proficient. Let's agree to disagree Stealthy and leave it at that. such patronising comments do not make a discussion.(which btw was on unnecessary costs in aviation) the real problem out there is that you people strive for absolute perfection in a process that can never approach perfection. no process can but you'll kill it trying. the...

... brackets above. Stealth Pilot You have no idea about me Stealth, please don't presume you do. I have no problem with the CASA system being overhauled, a lot of CASA's regulations are over the top and unnecessary, but this don't fit with your whine...do it? So your cite is "I've seen it first hand". Well then, it must be true. Get back to me when you have a clue. Ric