On Jan 31, 12:12pm, Tom posted this challenge:

And then, on Apr 11, 8:46 am, Tom sweetened the deal:

________________________________________________

I will take that challenge.

It is my view that a strong case can be made that Tom does post as
"Tim", his uglier, nastier alter-ego. After all, Tom is no stranger
to posting to forums from different accounts.

Here is what I will and what I won't prove:

I won’t prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Tom posts as "Tim".
But this is not criminal court anyway. This would be closer to a
civil court case.

I will prove it on the balance of probabilities.

When I'm done, if there is evidence that would convince 12 random
people that there is a strong probability that “Tim” is really Tom, I
will consider the case closed.

On Apr 27, 2:29 pm, Nostromo wrote:

that is a VERY revealing posting by "fakeobama" from a "common denominator"
standpoint.

--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru

Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From

Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf

Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing

Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.

Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:Eridncu6uP3zUojVnZ2dnUVZ_tijnZ2d@pghconnect.com...

Well Gordita? You've been shown to be a lying scumbag, now are you going to
admit your lie and say you're sorry?

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:u_WdndhEUKLba2LanZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@pghconnect.com...

So I did read what fastseduction.com tells potential advertisers

From:

http://www.fastseduction.com/advertise.shtml

Fast Seduction 101, at www.fastseduction.com, has been running and operating
for over 7 years. Site traffic has escalated consistently over this time as
we continue to maintain our primary focus: to remain the largest FREE
resource of pick-up and seduction information for men worldwide

LOL

A strong probability is not proof.

I know for a fact that Tom and Tim are two separate people.

One thing that has been said is that the fact that they both post from
an @essential-skills.com address, they are the same person.

LOL. Tim works for Tom (or used to) and are good friends. Tim simply
got an @essential-skills.com e-mail address from Tom.

On 27 apr, 23:29, Nostromo wrote:

hans.jager@hotmail.com wrote in news:996d13e8-71bc-4b89-b56b-94c144a78c37
@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:

However, you do NOT 'know for a fact' that more than one person is
posting under those two names.

--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language

Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.

On 28 apr, 16:54, "Krus T. Olfard" odor.com> wrote:

Ok, fair point, I admit. But, I have known Tom, now that I think about
it, for many years and I consider him to be a friend. It would highly
surprise me if he's posting as Tim. That's just something he doesn't
do.

That's just my assesment based on how I know him. Offcourse this would
be just me saying this on usenet, I admit. But more than that I cannot
say.

This would not be proof and won't settle the issue, but that's all I
can make of it.

On 28 apr, 16:54, "Krus T. Olfard" odor.com> wrote:

Sorry if something like this gets posted twice, compter's acting
weird.

Anyway, you have a fair point here. But all I can say is that I've
known Tom for years and think I've come to know him pretty well. He's
not someone who does this. I've always know him to be an honest and
trustworthy person.

Offcourse this is just my opinion on usenet, but that's all I can say.

This offcourse also is not proof and does not settle the issue, but if
you know someone for a while, usually your assesment can be trusted.

On Apr 27, 4:29 pm, Nostromo wrote:

Since, all you need is strong possibilities for evidence as proof then
we can conclude your a fucking moron.

Tim

On Apr 27, 4:29 pm, Nostromo wrote:

If you want to put up 20,000 as a bet, against his offer? Then let
the challenge begin, if not then your just a blow hard dumb ass fucker
with no life that just sits on the internet because your are a loser.
Hell, I'll bet you ain't even got 20 bucks.

Tim