On Sep 12, 10:27Â pm, Vance
gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 12, 7:13Â pm, nfm
gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Sep 12, 2:21Â am, Vance
gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> [hardcore pre-teen sarcasm standup comedy routine snipped along with genitals]
>
>> sit, bitch!
>
>> stay, bitch!
>
>> good, bitch! :) lol
>
>> you're too fucking stupid to even begin to compete with me.. when you
>> learn some respect, little girl, you can try again..
>
>> until then, take your little incoherent bitch ass back to the curb
>> where you belong.
>
>> upside your head,
>
>
> You go on and on about how stupid people are and respect. Â Well, as
> far people being stupid goes, which is, of course in comparison to
> you, it would be reasonable to expect to see some demonstration of
> your intelligence. Â
hey stupidfuck, i've already demonstrated my intelligence.. the
problem is not with the demonstration.. the problem is that i'm
demonstrating it to fucking idiots like you.. your lack of education
is not MY responsibility. it's YOUR responsibility.
>Where better to look than your pride and joy,
> manood101 and the material there. Â It's your best thinking, isn't it?
no it's not 'best' thinking.. it just happens to be very COMPETENT
thinking. you're too fucking dumb to understand my 'BEST' thinking..
it's good enough that you have access to my competent thinking.
hang on stupidfuck, i missed that post in the midst of all your other
incoherent jibber jabber.. i'll go answer that one first.. then i'll
tackle this one.
ok. DONE!
> The best I can figure is that your background is lower middle class
> and you at least got a contemporary High School education and may have
> attended a second rate community college where you were a third rate
> student. Â I could be wrong,
yeah, that's never happened before.. .lololol :)
you put the hahahahah in comedy. keep going, oprah... next, you'll be
telling me the names of my pets and my astrological sign.. you aren't
part of the psychic friends network by chance?
> but there isn't any solid evidence for
> anything else in your drivel.
sure, there's plenty. but you're too fucking stupid to gauge any of it
properly, remember?
know your limitations, little girl.
> As far as respect goes, Mr. Manly Man, it is common to give a certain
> base level of respect, just above disrespect, it's more neutral than
> anything else, but there is a small courtesy positive regard you get
> automatically and then you have to earn any level of respect over an
> above that.
my respect comes from my articles which are worth their weight in
gold...
and i know it's hard for stupidfucks like you to understand the
concept of respect, but let me help you brush up here:
you GET the respect you GIVE.
which means you don't get ANY of my respect, you fucking idiot :)
you get to be treated like every other incoherent yapping bitch i've
come across... so don't cry like a little bitch, when i treat you like
a bitch... when you act like a bitch, you should expect it. but then
again, you're too stupid to comprehend any of this, so i'm sure
whining is pretty high up on your agenda.
>Â I'm pretty sure that you will find that you're running in
> the red as far as respect goes and I don't see you recovering from the
> deficit.
hey stupidfuck, i'm sure you'll never quite understand this, but it's
not really much of a concern to me whether i have the respect of an
incoherent, angry little girl like you or not... why would i care if a
fucking idiot like you didn't respect me... it's not like i want to
actually talk to someone as dumb as you on a regular basis.. maybe
it's better than you don't look up to me or pay me any attention.. :)
saves me the trouble of ignoring you, right?
> Your take on female sexuality is laughably wrong and has been wrong
> for at least something like at least 2,600 years.
coming from a fucking moron with no idea how female sexuality works,
that's actually a compliment! thanks little girl! :)
>Â I can come up with
> the author and the date for you, but in an old Hebrew text there was
> quite an explanation about the dangers of uncircumcised men because
> they were able to meet the notoriously high sexual appetites of women
> better since they didn't come as fast as circumscribed Jews, which
> meant that they gave more pleasure and women really, really liked
> that. Â
wait, you're saying that people liked sex.. even back then?..... wow
that's groundbreaking news!
i bet you were the brilliant reporter who first broke the "water is
wet" story ... all by yourself..
you go, girl!
>One can go as far back as the Epic of Gilgamesh, circa 2500 BCE
> if memory serves, where a woman's sexual appetite played a key role
> several times over. Â A big mistake he made was turning down Istar's
> offer to have sex and he wasn't the first mortal to get the offer,
> just the first to say no and, well you know what they say about a
> Goddess scorned. Â
and then goldilocks said that this porridge was JUUUUUST right and she
ate it all up....
is there a reason why you're telling me irrelevant stories..oh right..
you're a FUCKING INCOHERENT MORON who can't connect the dots
properly.. i forgot..
carry on.
>In fact, you can pretty much go as far back in
> history as you want, to whatever culture you want, and you will find
> that women have quite healthy libidos.
wow. so women actually LIKE sex..?.. this is just... amazing... it's
like... we have sex..and then babies are born..and then we do it all
over again... fucking incredible...
what's next on your amazing lecture circuit... "don't stare at the
sun" ...?...
no i bet it's going to be your infamous "green grass: myth or fact"
lecture...
oh the suspense.
> Â Men, real men since they would
> have to be because feminism wasn't around yet (your position being
> that feminism has created the problems of manhood),
wrong yet again, stupidfuck.. feminism is not merely referring to the
1960's bra burning protests... we're referring to the PRINCIPLE of
feminism, not the historical movements referred to as 'feminism'.. way
to pay attention there, dumbfuck.
> have always known
> this. Â Since then, science has pretty much established the truth of
> 'Famberg's Law' which is 'They are just as horny as you are.' Â Lee
> Famberg  wasn't a scientist, just someone I went to High School with.
which is just as scary because you 2 dumbfucks are probably bright
enough to develop Shockberg's Law which states that sticking a fork
into a light socket improves your hairstyle..oh yeah shockberg was a
kid i went to school with.. a real dumbfuck (reminds me of someone i
know.. ) he would try to codify things by using incoherent logic..
eventually he ended up electrocuting himself..
> We both shared the same knowledge, but he codified it.
 I thought you
> would appreciate that, being all into codifying and such.
now why would i appreciate dumbfucks codifying nonsense?... what are
you gonna do next, codify your mouth to duct tape?... how about you do
something really productive and figure out a way to codify a few brain
cells.
> So, it would seem that your notions of female sexuality are way off,
not really. you're just too fucking stupid to make a valid point. you
have no clue what my view is or what a female's view is for that
matter.. the only thing you know is larry, curly and moe's law of
dumbfuckery...
> which anyone here could have told you based on their personal
> empirical research. Â Then more drivel about libido and the male sex
> drive being far greater where you equate promiscuity to a love of sex,
> which is simply a wrong and unsupportable inference.
your whole theory is wrong which just goes to show your utter
inexperience with women.. what a fucking moron.
> Â Actually,
> promiscuity comes from our being primates and falling into the
> catagory of animals that do what is called Tournament Mating. Â I'll
> leave that here for now, but if you want to be educated, I'll be happy
> to tutor you, if you ask nicely.
you're too fucking stupid to tutor anyone, let alone me.. i don't want
to learn how to think like an incoherent fucking moron.. that's called
entropy..
>blah blah blah fucking idiotic nonsense blah blah blah
uh huh...uh huh.. yeah yeah you're a fucking moron.. we already know
that.. anything else?
> Anyway, that's enough for this coffee break and don't feel bad about
> anything I have said. Â You are relaxing and go well with coffee, which
> I truly appreciate.
>
> When you come back with your predictable response, could you dress it
> up a little. Â I would like to think we are building a relationship and
> maybe I deserve a little special treatment, you know? Â After all, I
> paid you a compliment and told you how cute you are when you're mad.
nah stupidfuck, you're a typical fucking predictable moron making the
same predictable mistakes...
you're a funny little girl with anger issues.. but it's cute to watch
you struggle so hard to make a valid point..
A for effort
D for DUMBFUCK.
xoxo,
NFM :)
manhood101.com
