> The Principles of Manhood & Attraction by Manhood101.com
>
> [Please Refer to Attraction Matrices]
>
> Principles of Manhood (POM)
>
> Principles of Womanhood (POW)
>
> Principles of Attraction (POA)
>
> Functional Authority (FA)
>
> Social Authority (SA)
>
> Expression (E)
>
> Perceived Value (PV)
>
> Manipulation of Perceived Value (MPV)
>
> Functional Value (FV)
>
> Socialized Value (SV)
>
> Need-based, Lasting Attraction = FV(FA + E)
>
> Want-based, Temporary Attraction = SV(SA + E)
>
> For Men: POA = POM + E
>
> For Women: POA = POW + E
>
> increase or decrease of FA + E = MPV [Functional Attraction]
>
> increase or decrease of SA + E = MPV [Socialized Attraction]
>
> Functional Attraction (need-based Attraction) vs. Socialized
> Attraction (fool's gold attraction or want-based Attraction)
>
> regarding the Principles of Attraction as they relate to the
> Principles of Manhood, let's look at me first. i'm attractive because
> of several different things. first, i am an expression of Functional
> Male Authority. and i have a good expression of FMA and i am a
> stimulating expression of several other things. we call this
> stimulating expression, my 'personality.'
>
> i also have an avg. physical attractiveness offset by a variety of non-
> attractive physical features.
>
> so let's see what makes up my UNIVERSAL attractiveness--the PRINCIPLES
> of Attraction & Manhood that apply to ALL MEN. then we'll look at what
> BOOSTS attractiveness --the things i can do to make others PERCEIVE me
> as attractive and the natural attributes i possess or have developed
> to make me more attractive.
>
> first we need to understand what causes attraction in men & women and
> the 2 different types of attraction that result.
>
> men are more prone to being visually attracted to women. if you take a
> supermodel and put her in a MacDonald's uniform, men won't care as
> long as she looks HOT. conversely if you take a supermodel guy and put
> him in a MacDonald's uniform, women won't find him as hot. why?..
> because women are NOT appearance-based in their attraction.
>
> eg. once i talked to a woman i met online. i had seen her pictures.
> she hadn't seen mine. i had only talked to her over the phone. but i
> was able to convey VALUE which caused attraction for her. of course
> she asked to see my picture, but i never showed it to her. i simply
> controlled the frame of interaction. and in doing so, i established my
> value. so she came to meet me, SIGHT UNSEEN... all you men with your
> shirts off in your photographs are assigning what YOU value to what
> women value. this is WRONG. that's not to say that women don't like a
> nice face/body. but to attach what MEN value (looks) to what women
> value is a bad idea. the same applies to women. women often attach
> what THEY value to what men value.. that's why women always harp about
> their brain size, education and career accomplishments.. why do they
> do this? because this is what THEY value in a MAN. not what MEN value
> in a WOMAN. men value PHYSICAL BEAUTY. who cares how many degrees she
> has. a CEO title will not cover an ugly face. MEN value physical
> appearance.
>
> women are more prone to being status-based in their attraction. this
> doesn't mean your physical appearance is meaningless. it just means
> that, for women, the basis of your attractiveness does not rest on how
> you look. this is CRUCIAL in understanding WHY & HOW you can
> manipulate your PERCEIVED attractiveness on top of your base physical
> attractiveness. this is the basis for creating Temporary Attraction or
> Want-Based Attraction.
>
> next we need to know what aspects of attraction are universal and
> apply to both genders. and from this we'll see what applies to men
> specifically.. the application or misapplication of these fundamental
> principles will determine whether you will create Temporary Attraction
> (Want-Based) or Lasting Attraction (Need-Based Attraction.)
>
> Men & Women all start out Want-Based. They know what appeals to them
> naturally, just like a child knows chocolate cake is 'sweet'. They
> understand the concept of 'WANT.'
>
> But this is not the same as the concept of 'NEED.' Need is
> fundamental, necessary. Want is also fundamental, but optional. And
> may often end up being detrimental. You may WANT a new car or WANT a
> "cool" pair of pants, but these wants are not necessary. You can
> thrive without them.
>
> However, you NEED food. You NEED clothing, shelter, etc. There are
> certain wants that mirror our needs. But the needs are the fundamental
> element found in all wants.
>
> eg. you may 'want' a "cool" car like a Ferrari although, it's not
> necessary to have a Ferrari. you can get by with just an Honda or a
> Toyota or a Volvo, etc. but contained within that Want is the element
> of Need. you need to get from point A to point B. you may want to get
> there in style. but either way, the point is to eventually get to your
> destination.
>
> the problem arises when you start mistaking your Wants for your Needs.
> when you make the mistake of thinking you actually NEED a Ferrari to
> get to your destination, then you lose sight of your true Needs. and
> this is the situation with women today. under Feminism, women have
> been given the chocolate cake of Want. they are told that this cake is
> important. so they WANT the chocolate cake. now, contained within that
> chocolate cake is the element of NEED-- they NEED to be satisfied.
> they need food. so inherent in every Want is some fossilized element
> of Need.
>
> but the problem is that unrestrained Wants can cause damage. if women
> keep eating the chocolate cake, they will get fat. they will
> experience health problems, etc. so while this Want seems like a good
> idea, it actually becomes damaging in the long run. this is because
> they're not really addressing their Need. women NEED food. wanting
> chocolate cake is not inherently bad because we need to be satisfied.
> it's just that chocolate cake will not cause long term satisfaction.
> eating the cake for that moment is satisfying. but in the long term,
> continual eating of that cake(unrestricted provision of a 'Want')
> causes problems.
>
> in a similar manner, women are often duped into accepting things that
> fulfill their Wants in lieu of meeting their Needs. this is why women
> often become involved in meaningless activities like Astrology; the
> desire to be satisfied is not wrong. it's just that the means employed
> is not often productive to reach that end.
>
> it's not wrong to want to work in order to make money to eat. but
> being an assassin or a stripper is not a good way to fulfill that
> need. women will often not recognize the problem on their own. they
> don't understand that the ends do not justify the means. they will
> need a man to help them understand this. women will need men to show
> them that their Needs always precede their Wants. and women will also
> need men to show them that their Wants are usually built upon
> misguided attempts at fulfilling their Needs.
>
> k, let's go back to our starting point, Temporary Attraction. start
> with your physical appearance. your "looks" have a base appeal to
> people.. some prefer blonds, others, brunettes. this is mostly a
> result of training. but guys, in general, are concerned with how
> beautiful a woman is VISUALLY.
>
> women on the other hand are NOT visual-based. they may say they want a
> "hot" guy but women, trained under the childish philosophy of Feminism
> are not taught to be accountable for their words and as a result are
> notorious for saying what they don't mean. regardless of what they
> tell you, women are actually looking for a guy who they attribute
> VALUE to. not a guy with straight teeth or who's tall and handsome.
> this is all Disney bullshit.
>
> hot guy = valuable (or so they assume.)
>
> guy with high paying job = valuable.
>
> famous guy = valuable.
>
> ie. women are attracted to the PRETENSE of status.
>
> if a particular woman happens to be a brunette, she will prefer guys
> similar to herself.. if women have experiences with people outside
> their race (relatives, friends), their horizons will open. it's the
> ASSOCIATIONS that women form concerning your appearance or status that
> you need to pay attention to.
>
> if a woman is comfortable around white people it's because she grew up
> around white people. she will quickly associate "white" skin with
> comfort. unfamiliar races will make her uncomfortable. so to work
> around this, you'll need to change the ASSOCIATIONS she has formed
> regarding your race, skin color, general appearance, etc.. you'll
> essentially be redirecting her Wants and channeling them towards her
> Needs. instead of Wanting a white guy or a tall guy or a large guy,
> you'll be helping her to realize that she simply Needs a man who
> displays Manhood. you'll be breaking her old associations of value and
> helping her form new value associations.
>
> your appearance will only get your foot in the door. if your
> appearance isn't that striking, it's okay. there are other ways to get
> in the door..
>
> if you're a "hot" guy, you'll have more of a natural opportunity to
> talk to women because more women will be more willing to talk to you
> right off the bat. your looks create a certain PRETENSE that attracts
> women.. women will think that you're a good person simply because you
> look handsome. but often, this is where your advantage ends. "looks"
> will get your foot in the door. they will give you an OPPORTUNITY to
> express yourself. but if this isn't followed by an attractive enough
> expression, your opportunity will be wasted. that's why a lot of
> handsome guys go nowhere with women.. they get their foot in the door
> and then don't know how to step fully inside with the rest of their
> personality.
>
> eg. one of the guys i'm training is much better looking than me, yet
> he gets very poor results. he cannot keep his foot in the door. his
> handsome appearance then becomes more of a handshake. especially in
> more crowded places where there are more comparisons to make, your
> physical appearance will lose much of its impact for women..
>
> it's important to understand HOW women view guys, not just how YOU
> view women. guys are largely appearance-based; it doesn't matter where
> you put the woman-- ...
>
> read more »