|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: mstrhypnomstrhypno Date: Jun 2, 2008 12:30
On Jun 3, 8:13 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:>>> The Polgars were served by Express Mail to their place of
>>> business
>
>> Nope. No 'business', within any applicable meaning therof. So no
>> place of business can exist,
>
> SPICE is located on the Texas Tech campus.
>
>>> and employer, Texas Tech University, in accordance with
>>> Pennsylvania Rule 403 (the federal rules allow for use of the
>>> state rules for the district in which the case was filed),
>
>> Except where these are in conflict with any one of a number of
>> other laws, or breach any one of a number of conditions,
>
> Yet the previous poster cannot name one.
>
>> There are several candidates. ...
|
| Show full article (3.28Kb) |
|
| | 19 Comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jun 2, 2008 19:20
> Yet the previous poster cannot name one.
>
>> There are several candidates.
>
> For what? Freudian slip?
>
>>> which permits service upon out-of-state defendants by
>>> "signature mail."
>
>> No suitable signature obtained,
>
> Wrong. Texas Tech's person signed for the mail, which is then directed
> internally.
>
>>so no service. You wasted one of
>> the four things you are so precious short of,
>
> Oooh is that a threat?
>
>> The 90 days expired on May 18, ...
|
| Show full article (2.38Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: mstrhypnomstrhypno Date: Jun 2, 2008 14:51
On Jun 3, 3:23 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:>> Yet the previous poster cannot name one.
>
>>> There are several candidates.
>
>> For what? Freudian slip?
>
>>>> which permits service upon out-of-state defendants by
>>>> "signature mail."
>
>>> No suitable signature obtained,
>
>> Wrong. Texas Tech's person signed for the mail, which is then directed
>> internally.
>
>>>so no service. You wasted one of
>>> the four things you are so precious short of,
>
>> Oooh is that a threat? ...
|
| Show full article (1.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jun 2, 2008 23:21
>>>(h): (h) Serving a Corporation,
>>>Partnership, or Association.
>>
>> None of which are Polgar or Truong.
>>
>> --
>> Ray Gordon,
>
> In THAT case, you can't serve them by mail AT ALL, as noted in your
> failed case, as noted by the JUDGE in the ruling that stated, quite
> clearly, that it was out of bounds under FRCP to do so.
Federal Rule 4(e)(1) allows for service in any manner provided for by state
(PA) law.
PA Rule 403 allows for service of out-of-state defendants by certified mail.
PA law also allows a complaint to be "restated" by praecipe, which extends
the time of service, and which has no federal equivalent.
If the courts were to apply state law as a whole, the 120 day limit would
become meaningless in PA.
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Jun 2, 2008 16:20
gordon roy parker, legal buffoon who, as more than one judge has told
him, does not know shit about the law, spewed:
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jun 3, 2008 02:51
>So you had to physically serve
>them AS WELL AS send notice
>by mail according to (B) which
> says by ALSO mailing a copy
> AFTER the general
>agent which has been served,
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Jun 2, 2008 22:49
gordon roy parker, newzloon and legal buffoon, whined:
>
> The previous poster is not an attorney and does not represent the two
> defendants who were served, btw.
>
>
gordon roy parker is NOT an attorney and apparently did NOT serve anyone,
although he will try to claim otherwise.
--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mstrhypnomstrhypno Date: Jun 4, 2008 09:53
On Jun 3, 9:15 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:>>So you had to physically serve
>>them AS WELL AS send notice
>>by mail according to (B) which
>> says by ALSO mailing a copy
>> AFTER the general
>>agent which has been served,
>
> Incorrect. PA Rule 403 (which I used) does not require this.
>
> The previous poster is not an attorney and does not represent the two
> defendants who were served, btw.
>
> --
> Ray Gordon,
|
| Show full article (1.03Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray Gordon, creator of the pivotRay Gordon, creator of the pivot Date: Jun 4, 2008 20:16
>> The previous poster is not an attorney and does not represent the two
>> defendants who were served, btw.
>>
>> --
>> Ray Gordon,
>
> The previous poster is also NOT an attorney and has been rebuked by a
> FEDERAL JUDGE in a prior case for attempting service to an out of
> state defendant on the basis I cited in a ruling that essentially
> killed the previous poster's case.
'
Judges issue rulings that can be quotec and cited. The previous poster did
not cite anything.
Had the previous poster cited the record, he would have found that the case
involved a SUBPOENA on a NON-PARTY, which meant that the federal rules (Rule
45) applied, not the state rules, as with original process.
Here's an actual ruling by a judge in my district that explicitly states
that service by mail is legitimate:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:av3IIZPVqY0J:https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/...
|
| Show full article (1.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Krus T. OlfardKrus T. Olfard Date: Jun 4, 2008 21:04
gordon roy parker, after being told by more than one real live judge that
he don't know shit about the law, still spouts legal interpretations as
if he were a lawyer, which of course he is not:
>
> Here's an actual ruling by a judge in my district that explicitly
states
> that service by mail is legitimate:
>
>
And why would anyone place any faith in a legal interpretation by a known
newzloon, legal buffoon and liar?
--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
