After finally wading through all 79 pages of convoluted, conspirational
nonsense (I am not even going to attempt the appendices), I came to my
layman's conclusion that Ray is about to go 0-20. What I find ironic is
that if the accusations of someone faking Ray's identity are true, Ray
actually might have had a case. If Ray had kept this case simple and
just gone after Troung, he might have had a chance for some small
settlement. By throwing in all the other nonsense, he made the case too
complex. As usual, in making the case too complex he failed to properly
state a cause for relief.

If the courts agree with me, that will again prove Ray really is an idiot.

As you evidently are not an attorney, pardon me for being unconvinced.

Instead, post the suit here (misc.legal) so we can judge for ourselves.
Cut and paste the goddam whole into Usenet.

Since it has been filed (even if not served) the consent or knowledge of
the plaintiff is not necessary. It is public domain pure and simple.

We don't have time to follow kooklinks, if there are any, or use PACER.

I found via Google that a Ray Gordon is apparently involved publishing
fantasies about raping underage starlets or gymnasts, eg. below. Is it
the same person as the plaintiff? If so, it is pertinent to any
equitable remedy which he might be seeking.

Kyle

From: IownNique@hotmail.com
Subject: Ray Gordon vs. The Magnificent Seven (1 of 4)
Date: 1998/09/18
Message-ID: <36027EBC.3C45@hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 08:46:14 EST
Newsgroups: alt.sex.stories

but if U don't know yet writes...

Couldn't you at least have an open mind?

Couldn't you also stipulate that someone who
has far more experience dealing with Gordon
Roy Parker might be on to something that you
may not know because of your own inexperience?

As it is fond of being said here in alt.seduction.fast
you can go do your own homework.