| Re: STRIPPERWEB: Dottie Rebel, others accuse THE OTHER OWNER of rape. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: AlexAlex Date: Sep 18, 2008 19:33
On 9/18/08 10:27 PM, in article N6EAk.13307$rV4.10956@newsfe03.iad, "Odious"
cox.net.nospam> wrote:
>>> "Accused" is the operative word there. By the sounds of it the only
>>> place
>>>> he's been convicted is in the court of public opinion.
>>>
>>> "ZForce" treats internet hearsay as his gold standard when it suits
>>> him. Are three women who claim to have been drugged and raped by the
>>> same man, lying?
>>>
>
> I always question the payday motive. Does the guy being accused have money?
> Is the person doing the accusing the type of person who would do anything
> for money?
>
> Look at the Duke university case... a stripper accused some rich white boys
> of rape, thinking there'd be a payday in it for her.
>
> Even though they could prove beyond any shadow of a doubt they were
> innocent... charges were still filed. It damn near ruined these boys'
> lives.
>
> Plus I doubt any accusations of rape that aren't immediately reported to the
> police. Some chick wakes up in the morning with bloody sheets... that's
> called evidence. That's the stuff that PROVES something went down. Why
> not report that to the police right away so they can do a rape kit, check
> for drugs and get the evidence needed to lock this guy up if he's guilty?
> Why wait a week or a month, then announce it publicly instead of going to
> the police?
Different people have different reactions to traumatic events.
I wouldn't dismiss a rape claim out of hand just because it wasn't
immediate.
|