The dancers he gave money to are STILL defending him.

Stripperweb is registered to Curtis Pryce, of California, but "The
OTher Owner" has apparently been funding the site.

http://www.stripperweb.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125239

Right now I have an extremely important request.

At this time I have two other victims who were raped by him under
almost the exact same circumstances, as well as another who is
currently unwittingly being groomed in the exact same manner we three
were. One of the other victims is a friend of a very, very trusted SW
member.

I need to know who else is out there. If any of you have any
information about other victims, other women he has had ongoing email
contact with, other women he has even given money or gifts to "with no
strings" please email me at NeveragainonSW@yahoo.com.

I PROMISE YOU I WILL NOT BETRAY YOUR CONFIDENCE. I will tell no one.

"RayGordon" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:41ba8acb-6543-454c-a0ca-24f02d8af060@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Still illegally accessing websites you are banned from. People get sued for
shit like that.

Trying to bait strippers into revealing personal info he porker?

RayGordon cybersheet.com> wrote in news:41ba8acb-6543-454c-a0ca-
24f02d8af060@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

Then what do you want the information for? If you "will tell no one" then
what would anyone gain by telling you the information except to
possibly... well, I do not even want to contemplate.

--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language

Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.

Took me a minute but my take is that fr00t l00p reposted a post to SW by
someone else.

The story here is that Kevin Hendzel, aka The Other Owner, has been
accused by several members of stripperweb of drugging and raping them
and the site's owner refuses to ban that guy, but censors everything
posted by anyone about it. Because The Other Owner pays for the
site's hosting bill (and probably something "extra" for the "owner" -
Curtis Pryce.

Curtis Pryce allows an accused serial rapist to run free on his
website to stalk, harass and otherwise do as he pleases on his
website, all because of money.

"Accused" is the operative word there. By the sounds of it the only place
he's been convicted is in the court of public opinion.

"ZFORCE" wrote in
news:48d229ff$0$24010$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:

Actualy, announcing who is banned from a site would violate much more
serious computer-privacy laws, but that's assuming someone banned even
accessed it in the firat place. Posts are easily e-mailed.

Now, the "Food Lion" case tested this theory, where Food Lion sued ABC
for having a reporter pretend to be an employee to investigate
"redating" of meat or something like that. Food Lion won...$2.00.

Perhaps one day "ZForce" will oppose drugging and raping women the
with the ame intensity as he "opposed" this.

"Accused" is the operative word there. By the sounds of it the only
place

"ZForce" treats internet hearsay as his gold standard when it suits
him. Are three women who claim to have been drugged and raped by the
same man, lying?

On 9/18/08 12:08 PM, in article
b1b4daa8-877f-4fc9-b2c5-9c0d694f2960@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com,
"RayGordon" cybersheet.com> wrote:

Perhaps one day fr00t l00p will explain his desire to see women "six feet
under."