Re: Strippers think no matter how poorly they treat customers, they'll keep spending
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.seduction.fast only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Strippers think no matter how poorly they treat customers, they'll keep spending         

Group: alt.seduction.fast · Group Profile
Author: dman
Date: Apr 2, 2008 23:21

On Apr 3, 8:58 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:
>> So far, the dancers are right: men are PATHETIC LOSER CHUMPS who feed
>> money
>> to women in exchange for NOTHING.
>
> No argument there, but...

why in the world are you replying to YOURSELF?!?!

of course you have no argument there..

oh, and ashenthorn makes great points. thanks to the sex industry I'd
say we are over all BETTER off for it all
>
>> They think if one man wises up, another will be there to take his place
>> and
>> fork over the money, and THEY ARE RIGHT.
>
>> It is these men -- the CHUMPS -- who are the true enemy of the PUA. The
>> men
>> who price ALL men out of the market by spending even when doing so doesn't
>> improve their odds of getting laid one iota. Strip clubs are the epitome
>> of
>> this mass gender-betrayal.
>>>Actually, it's these men and the
>>>massive sex fantasy industry
>>>they feed who are the biggest
>>>friend to the PUA.
>
> Only inasmuch as the PUA doesn't help the men wise up, which is why the
> "seduction community" is so commercialized. Why should a PUA help create
> competition without being well-compensated?
>
> To the extent that the PUA is a parasite who requires an AFC host, you are
> correct.
>
>>One hot stripper can
>> occupy the time, wallet and
>>sexual fantasy life of tens (or
>>even hundreds) of men who
>>would otherwise be pursuing real
>>women for real relationships.
>
> And the women would be available for those because CHUMPS wouldn't be
> providing for them without getting laid.
>
>>These men are effectively off the
>>market for competing
>>for women who aren't sex
>>workers - their minds and
>>priorities are elsewhere.
>
> This is offset by the hotties who don't have to put out to get paid.
>
>>The
>>advent of freely available,
>>pervasive internet
>>pornography has even furthered
>>this phenomenon. Even college
>>age hotties nowadays complain
>>that their own boyfriends ignore
>>them in favor of porn, strippers
>>and other fantasy material.
>
> Not the hotties...ugly women maybe. Or the complaints are just fishing for
> attention.
>
>>All one has to
>>observe to confirm this is the
>>reality that non-stripper regular
>>chicks are out there taking "pole
>>dancing" classes just so guys will
>>pay attention to them!
>
> Only certain guys, and again, the hottie whose bills are paid without her
> having to put out for the money (or do real work) is costing money to the
> chumps who are paying their bills.
>
> Without the chump, the whole equation changes.
>
>>>If the target for the seduction is
>>>NOT a sex worker, the PUA is
>>>at an advantage because of the
>>>reduced competition,
>
> Hardly, as lots of jobs give "hired guns" the same economic freedom, and
> these days, some hot women can sit at home on cam and make six figures.
>
>>>and even
>>>if the target for the seduction is
>>>the stripper herself (which it
>>>shouldn't be for many obvious
>>>reasons), the PUA is STILL at
>>>an advantage because he's
>>>not a strip club customer
>
> Strippers are more than on to that gimmick. A flood of "cheap bastards who
> want dates and don't tip" kind of clued them in.
>
> The PUA is not an advantage because many other men are giving her what she
> wants. Any advantage he has comes from things that have nothing to do with
> being a PUA (assets like looks and youth rather than skills).
>
>>and since her financial needs are
>>being met
>>by a bunch of strip club
>>customers, she doesn't have to be
>>as concerned with whether her
>>PUA suitor has money.
>
> Nor does she have to be concerned with fucking him AT ALL. The few "PUAs"
> who meet her ideal might benefit, but they always did, and the rest of the
> guys do not.
>
> --
> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
>
> Finding Your A-Game:http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
> Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
> The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
>
> Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
>
> Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing
>
> Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
> no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
> from what they teach.
>
> Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
>
> Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
> contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
> targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
> their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: UPDATE Sprint Dumps Needy Customers - Gismodo - READ THIS - Interesting Customer Service Modelalt.cellular.sprintpcs ·