> ...other than the ones who are PAID to.
>
> In fact, female reaaction to these methods has been quite negative, beyond
> the 6s and below who hope the PUAs will settle for them or not notice they
> aren't 9s in the darkness of the nightclub that gives a kickback to the
> gurus who recommend it to their students, etc.
>
> The "community" has degenerated into a SELF-HELP SCAM that preys on
> desperate men, especially those with Aspergers, an inability to spot
> dishonesty, and a desperate need to belong.
Well, since you know so much about seducing women and are so
successful at it, and to repeat the question I posed FIVE YEARS AGO on
3/18/2003, which can be looked up here:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.seduction.fast/msg/196c7831e4eece18
:
"By the way, over the past ten days, how many women have you picked up
and had vaginal intercourse with, or how many times have you had
vaginal intercourse as a result of using your system in the past ten
days? You claim it works, so as a result of using it, either how many
women have you banged or how many times have you banged one or more
women in the last ten days?"
I can extend that to 90 days, or one year, or to the entire five years
since I asked you the first time, and the answer would be the same:
zero, nit, zip, nil, bupkes.
For all your talk about the supposed seduction community being a scam,
I note that people are getting laid... and you aren't. So much for
your capacity and the value of your critiques of people involved. At
least when Roger Ebert reviews a film, he's got reason to be credible:
he actually wrote a screenplay that was made into a movie, so he knows
something about the making of films. (Even though I probably
disagreed with many of his and the late Gene Siskel's reviews.)
Read my blog at
http://www.paul-robinson.us or
http://paul-robinson.us
(and yes, it no longer generates a referrer spam indication). Unlike
Ray, I actually have interesting things to say, from time-to-time.)
