On Dec 6, 6:55 pm, "Lumpy"
digitalcartography.com> wrote:>
>
> Obviously? I say nonsense. The more obvious is that now
> that he's worth a bazillion bucks he'll give some of
> it to her to shut her up.
It's possible -- and I'm just saying that it's also possible that at
least one of his accusers is totally honest. I mean, we know what
Arnold was like, we know what Hollywood big shots are like -- heck, we
know what guys are like -- and if it were simply about money, Arnold
would have released some letter from the ladies or their lawyers to
that effect. If anything, he actually conceded (his wife probably
made him, I suspect) that he was occasionally not on his best behavior
during those days (the ol' youthful indiscretion excuse), while still
denying these specific allegations (*you* read between the lines!).
> If some guy is a molestor, does it matter if he's an
> up and coming movie star, a mr Oly, Gov of CA or a
> floor sweeper? If what he did was so horrible that
> she needs to turn him in to someone, then she should
> have done so then.
Actually, no. I am, by definition, a rapist, since I've had girls say
"no" naked in my bed but I still fucked them, even made two cry in the
process. Now none of them ever hated me for it afterwards (or at
least they didn't break up with me and call the cops), but legally
speaking, I raped them, and if I were to run for World Dictator one
day, they might decide that, hey, people should know what kind of a
dictator I'd make! =)
