http://gambit.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/new-lawsuit-against-chess-federation/

Because the Times covers the USCF on their chess blog, our resident newsloon
has managed to get his name in the paper. Woohoo

They also note that he has not been a member of the USCF since 1996. This
fact alone would probably render the entire mess moot, as a non member would
not have standing to sue no matter what went on at the USCF internally.
Another wasted effort, and meritless filing from the worst lawyer on the
internet.

BTW, the USCF has no record, as far back as their online records go (1991),
of Ray ever having participated in a chess tournament.

--
"serial and vexatious litigant in both the state and federal courts" Gordon
Roy Parker in his Memorandum Opposing Google's MTD

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services

"Ted E Bear" johndoes.org> wrote in message
news:1203883822_445@news.usenet.com...

Courts generally and as a matter of principal, are loathe to impose
many types of sanctions on those acting as their own attorney. The
idea is that they are excercising a right and are inexperienced,
therefore a much greater latitude is given to them re what would
ordinarily be sanctioned. If a licensed attorney were to file
anything remotely like Gordon's complaints, responses and motions,
they would immediately be sanctioned. They are presumptively
knowledgeable and, like the Judges themselves, officers of the court.
They don't get a 'by.' Generally, the pattern is that the Complainant
has to do something truly aggregious in the Court's opinion, either as
a singular act or in the aggregate, or become so burdensome to that
Court in some way that they will act. Historically, the Courts...

From the group that didn't bother to check PACER (they claim to be
objective, and thorough, yet obviously don't do their homework), or they
would have known my mom died last July (which also refutes their arguments
related to "seduction" that were based on my living situation), we now get
more idiocy from "Teddybear":

One need not be a member to work for USCF. One certainly need not be a
member to sue under the Lanham Act, because that applies to competitors
(USCF also publishes chess books). Since I was impersonated on USENET,
membership in USCF also has no bearing.

"Teddybear's" UPL will make it impossible for me to consider any type of
settlement against any defendant, unless their attorneys deal with it as is
their option under PA law. They can file suit against him; I cannot. If
they don't, it'll be construed as tacit acceptance of his postings, which
are quite inaccurate regarding the applicable law.

Parker, you celebrated the day that Vance's wife died from stomach
cancer.

Now your mother died from stomach cancer.

What do you think about that?

Do you believe in God?

On Feb 24, 5:28�pm, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:

And who gives a fuck about you to check 'whatever' every day and night
to see what happens in your life? I read this NG for laughs, mainly at you,
but I don't search the net to see when you mother died. You also didn't seem
to care, because that time period, you kept posting here and elsewhere with
no mention of it. As for your 'living' situation, I know you are a child molesting
hate monging, faggot loser who wants to kill himself (herself?) that has no
life outside Usenet. Read below for proof of what I just stated, coward.

BTW, last time I heard, you were suing me (AGAIN!) and so far..nothing..

I guess USCF means more to you then your mother dying except for the leverage
it might give you to SUE again. 0 4 11, isn't "..inexcusable failure.." ?

His history also shows this posts...

(JJTj)

------ Gordon Roy Parker threatening children, the sick and elderly --------

"Vance" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:247f9dce-35e8-4ea1-8add-682711d31071@t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Courts generally and as a matter of principal, are loathe to impose
many types of sanctions on those acting as their own attorney. The
idea is that they are excercising a right and are inexperienced,
therefore a much greater latitude is given to them re what would
ordinarily be sanctioned. If a licensed attorney were to file
anything remotely like Gordon's complaints, responses and motions,
they would immediately be sanctioned. They are presumptively
knowledgeable and, like the Judges themselves, officers of the court.
They don't get a 'by.' Generally, the pattern is that the Complainant
has to do something truly aggregious in the Court's opinion, either as
a singular...

"Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:acGdnbpZg482clzanZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@pghconnect.com...

On Feb 24, 2:34 pm, HC aol.com> wrote:

Yeah, those "curses" are a bitch.