|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Alfred E. NeumannAlfred E. Neumann Date: Aug 4, 2008 08:58
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:Q5WdnTFmnvlLuArVnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d@pghconnect.com:
> Read the actual filing here:
>
> http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
>
> The case number is 08-cv-3630 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
> federal court.
>
> Claims include Lanham Act, Antitrust violations, and Fair Housing Act
> violations.
>
Shouldn't you have proof-read the thing?
"titled the balance" my ass
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: An Old FriendAn Old Friend Date: Aug 4, 2008 10:23
In article pghconnect.com>,
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
>> Shouldn't you have proof-read the thing?
>>
>> "titled the balance" my ass
>
> Spellchecker missed it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: An Old FriendAn Old Friend Date: Aug 4, 2008 10:33
In article pghconnect.com>,
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Read the actual filing here:
>
> http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
>
> The case number is 08-cv-3630 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
> federal court.
>
> Claims include Lanham Act, Antitrust violations, and Fair Housing Act
> violations.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: VanceVance Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:00
On Aug 4, 9:08Â am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:
>> Shouldn't you have proof-read the thing?
>
>> "titled the balance" my ass
>
> Spellchecker missed it.
>
How did you come up with this gem of English usage?
"While there are no laws about revealing information to the public,
even if it
harms the information, ...."
What court was it that complimented you on your writing?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: PentalopePentalope Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:00
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
> Read the actual filing here:
>
> http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
>
> The case number is 08-cv-3630 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
> federal court.
>
> Claims include Lanham Act, Antitrust violations, and Fair Housing Act
> violations.
>
Just read through it. Will fail due to EXACTLY the SAME reasons as ALL
his previous lawsuits failed - mere allegations with no link to the real
world...
Ray, why not just go on holiday and take a new direction? Aren't you
tired of wasting your life on USENET?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: PentalopePentalope Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:02
Vance wrote:
> On Aug 4, 9:08 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
> cybersheet.com> wrote:
>>> Shouldn't you have proof-read the thing?
>>> "titled the balance" my ass
>> Spellchecker missed it.
>>
>
> How did you come up with this gem of English usage?
>
> "While there are no laws about revealing information to the public,
> even if it
> harms the information, ...."
>
> What court was it that complimented you on your writing?
Shhh!!! It's more fun when the JUDGE points that out ... ;)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: VanceVance Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:09
On Aug 4, 8:52Â am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
cybersheet.com> wrote:
> Read the actual filing here:
>
> http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
>
> The case number is 08-cv-3630 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
> federal court.
>
> Claims include Lanham Act, Antitrust violations, and Fair Housing Act
> violations.
>
You have managed to prove, again, that your knowledge of and about the
law is flawed. Gordon, you have a law school right down the street
from you. Why don't you trade some of your 'valuable' seduction
training (worth thousands ) and have a law student look over
your work product. Maybe, just maybe, they might have a valuable
pointer or two for you.
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: PentalopePentalope Date: Aug 4, 2008 11:05
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
> Claims include Lanham Act, Antitrust violations, and Fair Housing Act
> violations.
>
"As plaintiff is proceeding Pro Se and is, ostensibly
neither an attorney nor well-versed in the law and procedure
involved in the pursuit of his claim, this Court recommends
that he seek counsel before proceeding further in what appears
to be a complex action."
"Nor does Plaintiff cite to any law to support his legal assertion
... Rather, Plaintiff offers one mere conclusory statement that he is
likely to prevail on the merits of his claim... Without more than mere
conclusions, this Court cannot consider and weigh the factors necessary"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|